Difference between revisions of "Measuring instruments for rivers"
Dronkers J (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Instruments for rivers== | ==Instruments for rivers== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Table 1, 2 and 3 present the available instruments (and accuracies involved) for measuring: | Table 1, 2 and 3 present the available instruments (and accuracies involved) for measuring: | ||
| − | * bed load transport, | + | * [[bed load]] transport, |
| − | * suspended sediment concentrations and transport rates, | + | * [[suspended load|suspended]] sediment concentrations and transport rates, |
* particle sizes and fall velocities, | * particle sizes and fall velocities, | ||
The order of preference is based on the overall sampling accuracy. | The order of preference is based on the overall sampling accuracy. | ||
| − | Simple mechanical instruments such as the bottle-type, the trap-type and the pump-type samplers are still very attractive because of their robustness and easy handling, particularly when used at isolated field sites. The accuracy of the measured parameters involved can be increased by increasing the number of samples collected. Analysis costs of all samples involved may be critical with respect to the available budget. Optical and acoustic instruments are attractive when large numbers of data have to be collected. As calibration is involved, the accuracy strongly depends on the quality/reliability of the calibration curves. Hence, many calibration samples are required using a pump sampler with the nozzle as close as possible to the optical/acoustic sensor. | + | Simple mechanical instruments such as the bottle-type, the trap-type and the pump-type samplers are still very attractive because of their robustness and easy handling, particularly when used at isolated field sites (see also [[pump samplers]]; [[bottle and trap samplers]]). The accuracy of the measured parameters involved can be increased by increasing the number of samples collected. Analysis costs of all samples involved may be critical with respect to the available budget. Optical and acoustic instruments are attractive when large numbers of data have to be collected (see also [[General principles of optical and acoustical instruments]]). As calibration is involved, the accuracy strongly depends on the quality/reliability of the calibration curves. Hence, many calibration samples are required using a pump sampler with the nozzle as close as possible to the optical/acoustic sensor. |
| − | A major technological advance for measuring suspended load transport is the in-situ Laser diffraction instrument (LISST). This instrument can measure the particle size distribution and sediment concentration simultaneously. An attractive solution is the LISST-ST, which includes a streamlined body to improve sampling accuracy and is equipped with a pressure sensor and current meter for measuring the sampling height above the bed and the ambient velocity. The velocity data are used to control pump sampling (isokinetic sampling) across the internal Laser arrangement. The velocity and concentration data are used to compute fluxes for up to 32 particle size classes at points, verticals, or in the entire stream cross-section. All data are transmitted via a cable to the survey vessel (on-line measurement). Limitations (related to light penetration) are the maximum concentration ranges of about 150 mg/l for fines (mud/silt) and 500 mg/l for sand particles. Hence, the instrument cannot be used in high-concentration conditions (close to bed; upper flow regime). | + | A major technological advance for measuring suspended load transport is the in-situ Laser diffraction instrument (LISST) (see also [[Optical Laser diffraction instruments (LISST)]]). This instrument can measure the particle size distribution and sediment concentration simultaneously. An attractive solution is the LISST-ST, which includes a streamlined body to improve sampling accuracy and is equipped with a pressure sensor and current meter for measuring the sampling height above the bed and the ambient velocity. The velocity data are used to control pump sampling (isokinetic sampling) across the internal Laser arrangement. The velocity and concentration data are used to compute fluxes for up to 32 particle size classes at points, verticals, or in the entire stream cross-section. All data are transmitted via a cable to the survey vessel (on-line measurement). Limitations (related to light penetration) are the maximum concentration ranges of about 150 mg/l for fines (mud/silt) and 500 mg/l for sand particles. Hence, the instrument cannot be used in high-concentration conditions (close to bed; upper flow regime). |
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:H532figure1.jpg|thumb|350px|left|Table 1 and 2 Instruments for bed load and suspended load]] | ||
| + | [[Image:H532figure2.jpg|thumb|350px|none|Table 3 Instruments for particle size and fall velocity]] | ||
| + | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
*[[Measuring instruments for estuaries]] | *[[Measuring instruments for estuaries]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 56: | Line 52: | ||
|AuthorName=Robertihans}} | |AuthorName=Robertihans}} | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Coastal and marine observation and monitoring]] |
| − | + | [[Category:Observation of physical parameters]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[Category: | ||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 29 June 2019
This article is a summary of sub-section 5.3.2 of the Manual Sediment Transport Measurements in Rivers, Estuaries and Coastal Seas[1]. This article describes which instruments can be used to measure bed load, suspended load, particle size and fall velocities in rivers.
Contents
Instruments for rivers
Table 1, 2 and 3 present the available instruments (and accuracies involved) for measuring:
- bed load transport,
- suspended sediment concentrations and transport rates,
- particle sizes and fall velocities,
The order of preference is based on the overall sampling accuracy.
Simple mechanical instruments such as the bottle-type, the trap-type and the pump-type samplers are still very attractive because of their robustness and easy handling, particularly when used at isolated field sites (see also pump samplers; bottle and trap samplers). The accuracy of the measured parameters involved can be increased by increasing the number of samples collected. Analysis costs of all samples involved may be critical with respect to the available budget. Optical and acoustic instruments are attractive when large numbers of data have to be collected (see also General principles of optical and acoustical instruments). As calibration is involved, the accuracy strongly depends on the quality/reliability of the calibration curves. Hence, many calibration samples are required using a pump sampler with the nozzle as close as possible to the optical/acoustic sensor.
A major technological advance for measuring suspended load transport is the in-situ Laser diffraction instrument (LISST) (see also Optical Laser diffraction instruments (LISST)). This instrument can measure the particle size distribution and sediment concentration simultaneously. An attractive solution is the LISST-ST, which includes a streamlined body to improve sampling accuracy and is equipped with a pressure sensor and current meter for measuring the sampling height above the bed and the ambient velocity. The velocity data are used to control pump sampling (isokinetic sampling) across the internal Laser arrangement. The velocity and concentration data are used to compute fluxes for up to 32 particle size classes at points, verticals, or in the entire stream cross-section. All data are transmitted via a cable to the survey vessel (on-line measurement). Limitations (related to light penetration) are the maximum concentration ranges of about 150 mg/l for fines (mud/silt) and 500 mg/l for sand particles. Hence, the instrument cannot be used in high-concentration conditions (close to bed; upper flow regime).
See also
Summaries of the manual
- Manual Sediment Transport Measurements in Rivers, Estuaries and Coastal Seas
- Chapter 1: Introduction, problems and approaches in sediment transport measurements
- Chapter 2: Definitions, processes and models in morphology
- Chapter 3: Principles, statistics and errors of measuring sediment transport
- Chapter 4: Computation of sediment transport and presentation of results
- Chapter 5: Measuring instruments for sediment transport
- Chapter 6: Measuring instruments for particle size and fall velocity
- Chapter 7: Measuring instruments for bed material sampling
- Chapter 8: Laboratory and in situ analysis of samples
- Chapter 9: In situ measurement of wet bulk density
- Chapter 10: Instruments for bed level detection
- Chapter 11: Argus video
- Chapter 12: Measuring instruments for fluid velocity, pressure and wave height
Other internal links
- Instrument characteristics of point-integrating suspended load samplers
- Guidelines for selection of sediment transport samplers
- Measuring instruments for coasts
- Measuring instruments for estuaries
References
- ↑ Rijn, L. C. van (1986). Manual sediment transport measurements. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft Hydraulics Laboratory
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
