Observing small scale morphodynamic processes during storm events

Figure 1: Area of investigation at the north end of the island of Sylt. The area is characterised by a sand hook pointing westward into the direction of the ebb transport of the tidal currents. The near shore part of the hook (see circle indicating the radar coverage) has a highly variable bathymetry with a long shore sand transport. The dashed and dotted frames indicate the areas for which the current field has been computed (Fig. 2-3). Dotted line: change of the bathymetry during the storm in February 2002, dashed line: the current example.

Introduction

A particular challenge for management of sandy coasts is erosion during storm events. Wind waves and swell transport a high amount of energy towards the coastline, which has to be dissipated within a short distance when arriving at the beach. This energy leads to a short but heavy increase in erosion, transport and re-deposition of sand. To protect the coast, measures such as “beach nourishment” have been established for the stabilization and conservation of the shoreline sediment. To observe the processes during a storm event and to monitor the success of any measures requires knowledge of the local interactions of waves and currents within the near shore area. Furthermore, longterm observations are necessary to study the change of the coast and the transfer of sediment.

Here we present the use of an area covering observation method which is based on RADAR technology that allows a continuous survey of the morphodynamical forcing by currents and waves as well as the response of the bathymetry even during storm events. The area of investigation (covering about 5 km²) lies at the north end of the Island of Sylt in the German Bight (Fig. 1).

Figure 2: Bathymetries deduced from radar wave observations before and after a storm (8 to 9 Bft.) The upper figure shows the situation on February 22nd and the lower on February 28th 2002. Isolines are referenced to NN. Evident during the storm is an increase of sand along the ship way, 500 m west of the shore. Loss of sand is observed close to the shore and in the northwest corner.

Methodology

The local water depths and the local current vectors (velocity and direction) are deduced from the Radar backscatter signal by an inverse modelling technique. During 10 minutes of radar observation the radar detects and tracks wave crests in space and time, from which the local change of the dispersive wave propagation is computed (for the physical background see next section). The dispersion describes the propagation speed of the different wave components. For this procedure a national and international patent was awarded in 2003. The method was developed at the Department of Radar Hydrography of the Institute for Coastal Research/GKSS and is licensed as a commercial product (DiSC) by Vision 2 Technology GmbH (www.v2t.de), partner of the Geesthachter Innovations- und Technologie- Zentrum (GITZ).

Figure 3: Current fields observed on 25th of February 2002 (upper part). The time series of the current vector is given for the position marked by the purple dot (lower part). The vector field was acquired at the beginning of flood tide, which corresponds to the first time step of the series.

The dispersion relation for sea surface gravity waves is derived from the Eulerian equations of motion, the continuity equation and from the dynamic kinematic boundary conditions at the sea surface and the sea floor. A detailed description is given in Senet et al. (2008). As the wave height does not influence the dispersion, the positions of the wave crests as they are tracked by the radar can be used for the inversion of the local water depths directly from the radar. The three dimensional Fourier decomposition of the radar images gives the actual effective dispersion of the waves, which is controlled by the local water depth and current. Deviations from the undisturbed dispersion are used to determine the spatial distribution of these two hydrographic parameters, which then are composed into a grid, and used to construct a map of water depth (bathymetry) and current.

Bathymetry

The examples in Fig. 2 and 3 show the water depth map as derived from Radar observations and the current fields observed during flood and ebb phases. Furthermore, the depth measurements have been averaged over a full tidal cycle before and after a storm (wind speed 8-9 Bft.) to estimate the change in sediment mass of the observed area. First, by using gauge measurements, the two maps have been set to a common reference. The difference of the sediment volume between the beginning and the end of the storm is estimated to be + 50.000 m³. It is considered to be the sediment net increase of the area under investigation. Following Flampouris et al. (2008), the accuracy for each grid cell lies within ±10%. However, the uncertainty of the assumption that the mean sea level remains constant during the two observations decreases the accuracy of the calculation.

Current

While the main impact of waves on the shore is erosion, currents mainly determine sediment transport and deposition. Fig. 3 illustrates an example of a current field observation acquired on February 25th 2002. Although the radar coverage is the same as for the cases shown in Fig. 2 the current field was computed for an area which was slightly shifted north - eastward (Fig. 1). The wind speed during acquisition was about 5 Bft. In addition to the current field a time series of current vectors is given in the upper part of Fig. 3. The position where the time series has been captured is marked with a magenta dot in the vector field. From the two dimensional vector field and the time series special features of the flood phase become evident. At the beginning of the flood phase the northward directed current is blocked by the pressure of the current, which flows along the main gully in the North, where the water depth increases to 20 m and more. Due to the rise of the water level during flood this effect diminishes and the water transport rotates toward the north, following more and more the morphology of the side gully.

References

The main author of this article is Ziemer, Friedwart Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article. Citation: Ziemer, Friedwart (2009): Observing small scale morphodynamic processes during storm events. Available from http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Observing_small_scale_morphodynamic_processes_during_storm_events [accessed on 23-11-2024] For other articles by this author see Category:Articles by Ziemer, Friedwart For an overview of contributions by this author see Special:Contributions/Username

The main author of this article is Flampouris, Stylianos Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article. Citation: Flampouris, Stylianos (2009): Observing small scale morphodynamic processes during storm events. Available from http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Observing_small_scale_morphodynamic_processes_during_storm_events [accessed on 23-11-2024] For other articles by this author see Category:Articles by Flampouris, Stylianos For an overview of contributions by this author see Special:Contributions/Username