Difference between revisions of "Port breakwaters and coastal erosion"
(→Port with the mouth of a large estuary.) |
(→Port with the mouth of a large estuary.) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
*However to protect themselves against the silting up of their basins, the ports build breakwater which, in fact, canalise water of the river preventing any sedimentation and therefore any migration of the mudflat areas towards the downstream, whereas they continue to be filled upstream. It follows from there a disappearance of these wetlands however essential from the ecological point of view. | *However to protect themselves against the silting up of their basins, the ports build breakwater which, in fact, canalise water of the river preventing any sedimentation and therefore any migration of the mudflat areas towards the downstream, whereas they continue to be filled upstream. It follows from there a disappearance of these wetlands however essential from the ecological point of view. | ||
*Recently, the various partners of the management of the coastal zones became aware of this problem. That is why, for example, that at the time of the enlarging of the port of Le Havre (France) at the mouth of the Seine, compensatory solutions were elaborate in dialogue in order to preserve these wetlands without penalizing the economic development (Program Port 2000). | *Recently, the various partners of the management of the coastal zones became aware of this problem. That is why, for example, that at the time of the enlarging of the port of Le Havre (France) at the mouth of the Seine, compensatory solutions were elaborate in dialogue in order to preserve these wetlands without penalizing the economic development (Program Port 2000). | ||
| − | [[Image:Figure_2.JPG| | + | [[Image:Figure_2.JPG|center|300px|]] |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Figure_3.JPG|center|300px|]] | ||
{{author | {{author | ||
|AuthorID= | |AuthorID= | ||
| − | |AuthorName= | + | |AuthorName= Michel Belorgey}} |
[[category:Theme 8]] | [[category:Theme 8]] | ||
Revision as of 12:05, 13 June 2007
Introduction
The analysis of the effects of the port breakwaters on coastal erosion cannot be approached without replacing the structure in its whole environment (Morphogic, Hydraulic, Lithologic). In addition it must be approached thinking of the relationship between the "vulnerability" and the "risk" (if one is invulnerable one does not risk anything). The risk is related mainly hydraulics which is the erosive power (wave, tide currents) and a little to morphology. The vulnerability is associated to morphodynamics and lithology. Consequently the parameters to be taken into account to analyze the effects of the port breakwaters depend on :
- General position of the port (ex : downstream estuary or not).
- Nature of the breakwaters, their positioning and their orientation (compared to the coast and compared to the directions of incident wave).
- Nature of the sea (with or without tide and tide current).
- Nature of the incident waves (main directions and intensity).
- Morphology and lithology of the zone influenced by the work (beaches or cliffs, sandy or rocky coasts).
Analysis of the effects of the port breakwaters on coastal erosion.
The variability of the parameters is large and a port breakwater is practically always a prototype, from which one have great difficulty to determine general conclusions which applie in all cases. However, if we restrain to some specific standard cases, it is possible to apprehend the principal effects caused by the port breakwaters.
Ports in "isolated environment" (sea without tide and any, or very little, river contribution in the basins).
In this case the breakwater are placed perpendicularly to the direction of propagation of the incidental waves which diffract (pass round the obstacle) on the pierhead. This phenomenon deviates the wave directions of attack of the waves at the coast, breaking an established balance and generating a more or less important erosion according to the lithological structure of the coast.
- If the coast is rocky, erosion is negligible.
- If the coast is sandy, erosion is important while remaining limited in space if there is no coastal current.
On the other hand, if the phenomena of erosion can remain limited, it is not the same of those related to pollution due to the harbour traffic, because the basins constitute structures relatively closed with any or little exchanges with the open sea.
Port with the mouth of a river in a sea with tide with coastal current.
Port located at the mouth of a river in a sea with tide with coastal current. In this case, the breakwater of protection against the incidental waves should not impede the river flow. So they are built in order to prolong the bed of this one. The entry of the port therefore consists of two parallel breakwaters generally built perpendicularly to the coast. This structure induces the following phenomena:
- Even for no frontal waves, but because of the phenomenon of diffraction, these parallel breakwaters constitute a wave guide and by heavy weather a difficulty for the entry of the boats in the port. On the other hand, this same phenomenon of refraction attenuates the wave within the basins located at the bottom of this channel,
- These parallel breakwaters built perpendicularly to the coast:
- Generate a phenomenon of refraction which modifies the angle of attack of the waves on the coast downstream the work (§ 2.1)
- Represent an obstacle to coastal sediment transfer.
- This last point is very important with regard to coastal erosion. Indeed, in the seas with tide and coastal current, the stability of the coast is due to a balance between erosion by transport of the sediments towards the downstream and fattening by contribution of sediments from the upstream. The construction of breakwaters perpendicularly at the coast blocks this coastal sedimentary transport and breaks this balance.
- Consequently, by refraction around the work, the coast is attacked hard by the waves downstream it, and there is a greater erosion due to the fact that the sediments transported downstream by the coastal current are not compensated by a contribution upstream, this one being blocked by the breakwater. For example, if the coast is made up of cliffs, the fact of destroying the estran of shingles at the feet of those (transport without recharging) induces a direct attack of the waves against the feet of the cliffs which are all the more fragile since the impact of the waves in the cracks of those deteriorates their in-depth structure.
Port with the mouth of a large estuary.
Here, the important problem is not so much the stability of the feature of coast, but the safeguarding of the mudflat area of the estuary. Indeed, in the absence of human intervention, the pail part of an estuary generally constitutes a wetland of great ecological importance (zone of reproduction of species of all kinds and zone of migratory stages).
- By contribution of the sediments of the river these wetlands or mudflat areas migrate permanently towards the downstream.
- However to protect themselves against the silting up of their basins, the ports build breakwater which, in fact, canalise water of the river preventing any sedimentation and therefore any migration of the mudflat areas towards the downstream, whereas they continue to be filled upstream. It follows from there a disappearance of these wetlands however essential from the ecological point of view.
- Recently, the various partners of the management of the coastal zones became aware of this problem. That is why, for example, that at the time of the enlarging of the port of Le Havre (France) at the mouth of the Seine, compensatory solutions were elaborate in dialogue in order to preserve these wetlands without penalizing the economic development (Program Port 2000).
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
[[Category:Articles by {{{AuthorFullName}}}]]
