Difference between revisions of "Disturbances, biodiversity changes and ecosystem stability"
(→Combined impacts) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
− | == | + | ==Loss of a species and disturbance== |
+ | ===Combined effect=== | ||
[[Climate change]] scenarios predict an increase in physical stress (e.g. by storms) and organic matter. Local activities cause the loss of some of the [[Keystone_species|key species]] in the [[ecosystems]] such as large seaweeds, [[seagrasses]] and burrowing worms. It is not yet known how these different impacts might combine to affect ecosystem processes. | [[Climate change]] scenarios predict an increase in physical stress (e.g. by storms) and organic matter. Local activities cause the loss of some of the [[Keystone_species|key species]] in the [[ecosystems]] such as large seaweeds, [[seagrasses]] and burrowing worms. It is not yet known how these different impacts might combine to affect ecosystem processes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.marbef.org MARBEF] scientists working on the [http://www.marbef.org/projects/biofuse/index.php BIOFUSE] project used simple experiments to compare the effect of loss | ||
+ | of a key species on a number of marine ecosystems, which were also subjected to an experimental disturbance. The goal was to find out whether the effects of biodiversity loss are the same across different habitats and locations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The loss of key species affected many, but not all, ecosystems. The influence of loss of species and disturbance varied among habitats and locations. In only a few cases there were complex combined effects of these two impacts. There rarely was any influence on [[ecosystem functioning]], which suggests a widespread capacity of ecosystems to compensate for the loss of a single species, even key species. This is good news with respect to these habitats, but the results showed variation between locations, something which is reflected in the [[Marine Strategy Directive|EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive]] where there is emphasis on regional focus. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Loss of species=== |
Revision as of 12:55, 1 September 2009
Contents
Increased river outflow
Climate models predict increasing variance in rainfall, with increased frequency of droughts paralleled by unusual amounts of rainfall and floods. In anticipation of this, the Mediterranean region is now being subjected to extensive river damming, which can have far reaching impacts on coastal food webs. For instance, the diets of the five most abundant flat fish species of the Gulf of Lions and their prey depend on river inputs. The common sole largely profits from the contributions from terrestrial organic matter, via their main prey: deposit-feeding polychaete worms. Therefore inland climate changes may affect coastal marine food webs, through variation in river flow.
Loss of a species and disturbance
Combined effect
Climate change scenarios predict an increase in physical stress (e.g. by storms) and organic matter. Local activities cause the loss of some of the key species in the ecosystems such as large seaweeds, seagrasses and burrowing worms. It is not yet known how these different impacts might combine to affect ecosystem processes.
MARBEF scientists working on the BIOFUSE project used simple experiments to compare the effect of loss of a key species on a number of marine ecosystems, which were also subjected to an experimental disturbance. The goal was to find out whether the effects of biodiversity loss are the same across different habitats and locations.
The loss of key species affected many, but not all, ecosystems. The influence of loss of species and disturbance varied among habitats and locations. In only a few cases there were complex combined effects of these two impacts. There rarely was any influence on ecosystem functioning, which suggests a widespread capacity of ecosystems to compensate for the loss of a single species, even key species. This is good news with respect to these habitats, but the results showed variation between locations, something which is reflected in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive where there is emphasis on regional focus.