Difference between revisions of "Eight levels of public participation"
m |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Arnstein also says that even 8 rungs is not enough to accurately differentiate between the levels of participation because there are many more distinctions between the way people participate in policy and programmes. | Arnstein also says that even 8 rungs is not enough to accurately differentiate between the levels of participation because there are many more distinctions between the way people participate in policy and programmes. | ||
| − | [[Category:Theme 2]] | + | {{Author |
| + | |AuthorID=14358 | ||
| + | |AuthorFullName=Kreiken, Wouter | ||
| + | |AuthorName=Wouter Kreiken}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Participation and governance in coastal management]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Theme 2]] | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 14 November 2007
These levels have been based on Sherry Arnstein’s “ladder of citizen participation” which is a useful theory to describe the level of public participation and clearly shows the difference between actual optimal participation and something that might appear to be public participation but is no more than a masquerade. However, it has been brought more up-to-date with less subjective language.
Her ladder illustrates the so-called “power” and “powerlessness” of people. It has 8 rungs with each one “corresponding to the extent of citizens’ power in determining the end product” viz.
1. Manipulation 2. Therapy 3. Informing 4. Consultation 5. Placation 6. Partnership 7. Delegated power 8. Citizen control
Arnstein also says that even 8 rungs is not enough to accurately differentiate between the levels of participation because there are many more distinctions between the way people participate in policy and programmes.
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
