Difference between revisions of "Talk:Biodiversity hotspots"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Review by Norbert Dankers (June 2013)== A large problem is that two definitions for biodiversity hotspots are given (high biodiversity value and many endemic species) whic...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
A large problem is that two definitions for biodiversity hotspots are given (high biodiversity value and many endemic species) which have to be under threat. Then a conclusion is drawn that these habitats have to be protected (leaving the rest of the world unprotected??).
+
A problem is that two definitions for biodiversity hotspots are given (high biodiversity value and many endemic species) which have to be under threat. Then a conclusion is drawn that these habitats have to be protected (leaving the rest of the world unprotected??).
 
Locally hotspots are defined by species richness only. This article warrants further working out, giving good definitios and discussing advantages and disadvantages of each
 
Locally hotspots are defined by species richness only. This article warrants further working out, giving good definitios and discussing advantages and disadvantages of each

Latest revision as of 15:19, 6 June 2013

Review by Norbert Dankers (June 2013)

A problem is that two definitions for biodiversity hotspots are given (high biodiversity value and many endemic species) which have to be under threat. Then a conclusion is drawn that these habitats have to be protected (leaving the rest of the world unprotected??). Locally hotspots are defined by species richness only. This article warrants further working out, giving good definitios and discussing advantages and disadvantages of each