Difference between revisions of "Non-native species invasions"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Impacts)
(The problem)
Line 73: Line 73:
 
Rates of invasion among most microscopic organisms such as bacteria are still unreported and it appears that their potential of dispersal by human-mediated vector is very significant.
 
Rates of invasion among most microscopic organisms such as bacteria are still unreported and it appears that their potential of dispersal by human-mediated vector is very significant.
  
Impacts of invasive species vary in different regions and sometimes are rather localized.
+
Impacts of invasive species vary in different regions and sometimes are rather localized.International Maritime Organization has compiled a list of the most unwanted marine invaders on a global scale. They are as follows:
 +
 
 +
Cholera (''Vibrio cholerae'') – various strains
 +
Native to: various strains with broad ranges.
 +
Introduced to: South America, Gulf of Mexico and other areas.
 +
Impact: Some cholera epidemics appear to be directly associated with ballast water.
 +
 
 +
Cladoceran water flea (''Cercopagis pengoi'')
 +
Native to: Black and Caspian Sea.
 +
Introduced to: Baltic Sea.
 +
Impact: Reproduces to form very large populations that dominate the zooplankton
 +
community and clog fishing nets and trawls, with associated economic impacts.
 +
 
 +
Mitten crab (''Eiocheir sinensis'')
 +
Native to: Northern Asia.
 +
Introduced to: Western Europe, Baltic Sea, west coast of North America.
 +
Impact: Undergoes mass migrations for reproductive purposes. Burrows into river banks
 +
and dykes causing erosion and siltation. Preys on native fish and invertebrate species, causing local extinctions during population outbreaks. Interferes with fishing activities
 +
 
 +
Toxic algae  – various species
 +
Native to: Various species with broad ranges.
 +
Introduced to: Various areas.
 +
Impact: May form harmful algae blooms. Depending on the species, can cause massive
 +
kills of marine life through oxygen depletion, release of toxins and/or mucus. Can foul beaches and impact on tourism and recreation. Some species may contaminate filter-feeding shellfish and cause fisheries to be closed. Consumption of contaminated shellfish by humans may cause severe illness and death.
 +
 
 +
Round goby (''Neogobius melanostomus'')
 +
Native to: Black, Azov and Caspian Sea.
 +
Introduced to: Baltic Sea and North America.
 +
Impact: Highly adaptable and invasive. Increases in numbers and spreads quickly. Spawns multiple times per season and survives in poor water quality. Competes for food and habitat with native fish including commercially important species, and preys on their eggs and young.
 +
 
 +
North American comb jelly (''Mnemiopsis leidyi'')
 +
Native to: Eastern seaboard of the Americas.
 +
Introduced to: Black, Azov and Caspian Sea.
 +
Impact: Reproduces rapidly (self fertilising hermaphrodite) under favourable conditions.
 +
Feeds excessively on zooplankton. Depletes zooplankton stocks; altering food web and ecosystem function. Contributed significantly to collapse of Black and Azov Sea fisheries in 1990s, with massive economic and social impact. Threatens similar impact in Caspian Sea.
 +
 
 +
North Pacific sea star (''Asterias amurensis'')
 +
Native to: Northern Pacific.
 +
Introduced to: Southern Australia.
 +
Impact: Reproduces in large numbers, reaching 'plague' proportions rapidly in invaded
 +
environments. Feeds on shellfish, including commercially valuable scallop, oyster and clam species.
 +
 
 +
Zebra Mussel (''Dreissena polymorpha'')
 +
Native to: Eastern Europe (Black Sea).
 +
Introduced to: Western and northern Europe, eastern half of North America.
 +
Impact: Fouls all available hard surfaces in mass numbers. Displaces native aquatic life.
 +
Alters habitats, ecosystems and food webs. Causes severe fouling problems on infrastructure and vessels. Blocks water intake pipes, sluices and irrigation ditches. Economic costs to USA alone of around US$750 million to $1 billion between 1989 and 2000.
 +
 
 +
Asian kelp (''Undaria pinnatifida'')
 +
Native to: Northern Asia.
 +
Introduced to: Southern Australia, New Zealand, west coast of the United States, Europe
 +
and Argentina.
 +
Impact: Grows and spreads rapidly, both vegetatively and through dispersal of spores.
 +
Displaces native algae and marine life. Alters habitats, ecosystems and food webs.
 +
May affect commercial shellfish stocks through space competition and alteration of habitat.
 +
 
 +
European green crab (''Carcinus maenas'')
 +
Native to: European Atlantic coast.
 +
Introduced to:  Southern Australia, south Africa, the U.S.A. and Japan.
 +
Impact: Highly adaptable and invasive. Resistant to predation due to hard shell.
 +
Competes with and displaces native crabs and becomes a dominant species in invaded areas. Consumes and depletes wide range of prey species. Alters inter-tidal rocky shore ecosystems.
  
 
== Further reading ==
 
== Further reading ==

Revision as of 15:36, 2 March 2009

Category:Stub


Introduction

The introduction of harmful aquatic organisms to new marine environments is believed to be one of the four greatest threats to the world's oceans. An alien or non-native species is one that has been intentionally or accidentally transported and released into an environment outside of its historic or resident geographical range or habitat. Such species are described as 'invasive' if they are ecologically and/or economically harmful. Most accidental marine species invasions are transported in ships' ballast water, and associated sediments, from fouling on ships' hulls and through aquaculture. Ballast water is the water taken in by ships for stability and is usually released on arrival at the destination port. Invasive species can dramatically change the structure and function of marine ecosystems by changing biodiversity and eliminating vital components of the food chain.

Over 100 non-native species have been recorded in the NE Atlantic, mainly in the North Sea, the Celtic Sea, the Bay of Biscay and along the Iberian coast. Over the past twenty years, the number of alien species transported into the Baltic has increased and poses a significant threat to the region given its naturally low species diversity. At least 50 non-native species have entered the Black Sea in the last century. Some have been invasive e.g. the comb jelly-fish Mnemiopsis leidyi was the primary cause of collapse of the fisheries in the area in the early 1990s.

Functional integrity of indigenous commuities

Even though all seas are interconnected, there are certain dispersion barriers such as salinity, temperature gradient or ocean currents that keep local communities distinct. Two identical habitats can have different species communities with different types of interactions contributing to the global richness of biodiversity. Indigenous, or native species are those living within their natural range (past or present) including the area that it can reach and occupy using its natural dispersal system. By contrast, introduced species are transported either intentionally or accidentally by human-mediated vectors into habitats outside their native range. These species are also termed as alien, exotic, invasive, foreign, non-native, immigrant, neobiota, naturalized, or non-indigenous. Some biota cannot be sufficiently proved to be neither native nor exotic and these are termed cryptogenic species. [1]

Through the evolutionary fitness processes, species adjust to each other and adapt to available resources by occupying different ecological niches within communities. Virtually all resources are utilized optimally and all available niches are filled, maximising the biodiversity value. Various factors influence the functional integrity of a community. If changes are occurring gradually over a long timescale species have enough time to adapt and fill available niches. In turn more rapid shifts create niche openings and this has been identified as the main prerequisite of species invasion. Non-native species are found primarily in disturbed areas, such as harbours, bays, estuaries and semi-enclosed seas where the communities are weekened by various types of pollution. [2][3]

Vectors of introduction

Whether deliberately or accidentally, people have been transporting whole range of organisms, breaking natural distribution boundaries and interfering with community structures. The unwanted hitchhikers are usually either well hidden or too small to be noticed – for the entire lifespan or just for its part.

For most coastal species the open ocean environment is inhospitable, preventing them from spreading into habitats similar to their own but located elsewhere. Distances separating such habitats might be too long to overcome either through their active swimming abilities or passive floating in water currents. Mechanisms by which humanity aids introduction of exotic species are called vectors of introduction and these are chiefly associated with shipment activities, marine aquaculture or ornamental species trade. Other vectors include the international transport and sale of live marine bait, live seafood, and live organisms for research and education. [4]

  • Shipment

Organisms can travel either attached to the submerged part of the vessels hull or contained within their ballast waters. Ballast water has been extensively used since 1870s and certain species are able to complete their life cycle and breed in ballast waters, meaning that they can be translocated far away from their native range. Studies on ballast tanks found more than 1,000 taxa ranging from phytoplankton to small fish up to 15 cm in length. [5]

  • Mariculture

There has been a growing interest in the search for fish, shellfish, and plant species whose biology was well known and which either already had achieved or could achieve success in cultivation. Depending on the type of mariculture, the organisms can be either allowed to establish in the wilderness (intentional species introduction) or kept in enclosures from which they occasionally escape (accidental release) either directly or through their dispersal system. Very often those new introduced species carried along parasitic organisms that could later establish themselves in indigenous species. Since the latter have not developed any defence strategy against non-indigenous parasites, they could be greatly impacted.

  • Ornamental species trade

Saltwater species are a rapidly growing sector of the aquarium industry. Species can be released by their owners either accidentally or deliberately when no longer wanted. This vector is responsible for one of the major invasions launched up to date, namely the release of Caulerpa taxifolia from Oceanographic Museum of Monaco.

  • Indirect introduction

Occasionally, species introduction can result not from their physical re-location but by offering a way for its dispersal to areas that it wouldn’t be able to reach if the conditions were not changed. Such opportunity is offered by alteration of hydrological regimes, like canal and reservoir construction. [6]

  • Secondary introduction

If species are introduced and become established in a new geographic setting, they might continue to spread by both natural and anthropogenic mechanisms, colonizing habitats that they wouldn’t be able to reach without the initial, human-mediated translocation. Such introduction is termed a secondary introduction.


Very rarely we can connect an invasion event with one particular vector. Instead it is more common to assess the probability of a given vector being responsible. In British waters accidental release associated with mariculture has been identified as the main vector with other important vectors being fouling, ballast water and deliberate commercial introduction. [7]

From establishment to invasion

Not all translocated species become established in new environments. If the population is relatively small it will be vulnerable to stochastic threats such as demographic or genetic drift. It is hard to predict what is the minimum viable population size. A generally accepted rule is that 50 individuals are needed to prevent excessive inbreeding and a minimum population of 500 hundred is required to keep a sufficiently high level of heterozigosity [8] . Yet, those numbers may very greatly between different taxa and even if the population is large enough to prevent loss of alleles, it still might be prone to environmental threats such as poor food or oxygen availability, impacting recruitment success or juveniles development, or catastrophic events (El Niño, tsunami, etc.)

If the founder population is large enough to overcome stochastic threats and manages to establish itself in a new environment, it will join the network of interactions within the receiving environment. Alien species have evolved in different environments and it is hard to predict what their interactions with indigenous biota will be. Not all introduced species can be termed as invasive. Some of them may well coexist with native species and share the resources. But every now and then an introduced species becomes an invader and impacts the host community, with the ultimate result being eradication of native species and destabilization of the system.

Impacts

  • Competition

Introduced species might have evolved in the presence of much more aggressive competitors than the ones present in the receiving environment and they might be extremely successful in colonising new areas. The most common competition is for resources, whether it is food, solar energy or space. In California bay the native shore crab (Hemigrapsus oregonensis) declined in mean abundance by 10 times as a consequence of the European green crab (Carcinus maenas) introduction and competition for food (Nutricola sp.). [9]

  • Diffuse competition

The impact on native organisms can be greater through diffuse competition. A population might resist competition along one axis if the resource is plentiful, but its realised niche can virtually disappear in the presence of several species competing along many axes. [10]

  • Positive indirect interactions

Even with a stable or decreasing rate of new introductions, it can be assumed that systems will become increasingly destabilized through positive indirect interactions and diffuse competition, as more and more interactions within the community become altered. Even early, non-invasive introductions may become a nuisance due to a change induced by another introduced species. [11] It is possible for a new alien to transform an older exotic species into an invader.

  • Predation and herbivory

Some organisms are more effective competitors for resources than others and have the potential to dominate the area, excluding other species from the access to viable resources. In such cases organisms feeding on it (predators or herbivores) act as a biocontrol agent keeping their abundance low and maintain a high level of stability and productivity. If those predators or herbivores are introduced to a new environment, local community members might be lacking the evolutionary-driven ability to resist them. On the other hand if a species limited in number in its native range by biocontrol agents is introduced to a new environment, it might thrive and outcompete indigenous species.

  • Parasitism

Very often introduced organisms are accompanied by parasitic species. Mass transfer of large numbers of animals and plants without inspection, quarantine, or other management procedures has led to the simultaneous introduction of pathogenic or parasitic agents.

  • Genetic impact

If transferred species are closely related to native counterparts, they may hybridise affecting the original gene pool. Introduced or hybridised individuals may prove to be more successful in mating than the indigenous organisms and the original genetic diversity might be lost.

  • Multiple negative interactions

Two species may interact with one another in a several ways. A species confronted by one-way interactions can compromise and trade-off one component of fitness for the sake of the survival. If it is forced to compromise too many components it may be pushed into an extinction vortex. [12]

The problem

Consequences of human-induced altering of species composition are sometimes detrimental to local communities and their magnitude may range from limitation or exclusion of single species or to destabilization of the whole system and species introduction has been identified as one of the main causes of species extinction. Even with a stable or decreasing rate of new introductions, it can be assumed that systems will become increasingly destabilized through direct and indirect interactions and diffuse competition as more and more interactions within the community become altered. In areas that have already been heavily invaded, reducing the numbers of new introductions may not be a sufficient strategy. In addition to preventing new introductions, it may be necessary to mitigate the impacts of exotic species that have already become established. Given the large number of alien species already present, there is a high potential for positive interactions to produce many future management problems.

Rates of invasion among most microscopic organisms such as bacteria are still unreported and it appears that their potential of dispersal by human-mediated vector is very significant.

Impacts of invasive species vary in different regions and sometimes are rather localized.International Maritime Organization has compiled a list of the most unwanted marine invaders on a global scale. They are as follows:

Cholera (Vibrio cholerae) – various strains Native to: various strains with broad ranges. Introduced to: South America, Gulf of Mexico and other areas. Impact: Some cholera epidemics appear to be directly associated with ballast water.

Cladoceran water flea (Cercopagis pengoi) Native to: Black and Caspian Sea. Introduced to: Baltic Sea. Impact: Reproduces to form very large populations that dominate the zooplankton community and clog fishing nets and trawls, with associated economic impacts.

Mitten crab (Eiocheir sinensis) Native to: Northern Asia. Introduced to: Western Europe, Baltic Sea, west coast of North America. Impact: Undergoes mass migrations for reproductive purposes. Burrows into river banks and dykes causing erosion and siltation. Preys on native fish and invertebrate species, causing local extinctions during population outbreaks. Interferes with fishing activities

Toxic algae – various species Native to: Various species with broad ranges. Introduced to: Various areas. Impact: May form harmful algae blooms. Depending on the species, can cause massive kills of marine life through oxygen depletion, release of toxins and/or mucus. Can foul beaches and impact on tourism and recreation. Some species may contaminate filter-feeding shellfish and cause fisheries to be closed. Consumption of contaminated shellfish by humans may cause severe illness and death.

Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) Native to: Black, Azov and Caspian Sea. Introduced to: Baltic Sea and North America. Impact: Highly adaptable and invasive. Increases in numbers and spreads quickly. Spawns multiple times per season and survives in poor water quality. Competes for food and habitat with native fish including commercially important species, and preys on their eggs and young.

North American comb jelly (Mnemiopsis leidyi) Native to: Eastern seaboard of the Americas. Introduced to: Black, Azov and Caspian Sea. Impact: Reproduces rapidly (self fertilising hermaphrodite) under favourable conditions. Feeds excessively on zooplankton. Depletes zooplankton stocks; altering food web and ecosystem function. Contributed significantly to collapse of Black and Azov Sea fisheries in 1990s, with massive economic and social impact. Threatens similar impact in Caspian Sea.

North Pacific sea star (Asterias amurensis) Native to: Northern Pacific. Introduced to: Southern Australia. Impact: Reproduces in large numbers, reaching 'plague' proportions rapidly in invaded environments. Feeds on shellfish, including commercially valuable scallop, oyster and clam species.

Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) Native to: Eastern Europe (Black Sea). Introduced to: Western and northern Europe, eastern half of North America. Impact: Fouls all available hard surfaces in mass numbers. Displaces native aquatic life. Alters habitats, ecosystems and food webs. Causes severe fouling problems on infrastructure and vessels. Blocks water intake pipes, sluices and irrigation ditches. Economic costs to USA alone of around US$750 million to $1 billion between 1989 and 2000.

Asian kelp (Undaria pinnatifida) Native to: Northern Asia. Introduced to: Southern Australia, New Zealand, west coast of the United States, Europe and Argentina. Impact: Grows and spreads rapidly, both vegetatively and through dispersal of spores. Displaces native algae and marine life. Alters habitats, ecosystems and food webs. May affect commercial shellfish stocks through space competition and alteration of habitat.

European green crab (Carcinus maenas) Native to: European Atlantic coast. Introduced to: Southern Australia, south Africa, the U.S.A. and Japan. Impact: Highly adaptable and invasive. Resistant to predation due to hard shell. Competes with and displaces native crabs and becomes a dominant species in invaded areas. Consumes and depletes wide range of prey species. Alters inter-tidal rocky shore ecosystems.

Further reading

References

  1. Carlton, J.T. (1996). Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77(6): 1653-1655.
  2. Elton, C. S. (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants, Methuen, London
  3. Cohen, A. N. (2004). Invasion in the sea. In: Park Science vol. 22, no. 2, fall 2004 pp. 37-41
  4. Cohen, A. N. (2004). Invasion in the sea. In: Park Science vol. 22, no. 2, fall 2004 pp. 37-41
  5. Gollash, S. (2004). A global perspective on shipping as a vector for new species introduction. Presented at the 13th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species, Ennis, Co Clare, Ireland 2004. Institute of Technology, Sligo.
  6. Grigorovich, I. A., MacIsaac H. J,. Shadrin, N. V., Mills, E. L., (2002). Patterns and mechanisms of aquatic invertebrate introductions in the Ponto-Caspian region. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 59: 1189-1208.
  7. Eno, N. C., Clark, R. A., Sanderson, W. G. (eds), (1997) Non-native marine species in British waters. Joint Nature Conservation Commission, Peterborough, UK.
  8. Franklin, I. R. (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox (eds) Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, pp. 135-39. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  9. Grosholz, E. D., Ruiz, G. M., Dean, C. A., Shirley, K. A., Maron, J. L. & Connors, P. G. (2000). The Impacts of a Non-indigenous Marine Predator in a California Bay, Ecology 81, 1206–1224.
  10. Giller, P. S. (1984) Community Structure and the Niche. Chapman and Hall, London.
  11. Grosholz, E. D. (2005) Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (4): 1088-1091.
  12. Russel, B.R., Mills M. D., Belk, M. C. (2004). Complex interactions between native and invasive fish: the simultaneous effects of multiple negative interactions. Presented at the 13th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species, Ennis, Co Clare, Ireland 2004. Institute of Technology, Sligo.
The main author of this article is Penk, Marcin
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.

Citation: Penk, Marcin (2009): Non-native species invasions. Available from http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Non-native_species_invasions [accessed on 22-11-2024]