Difference between revisions of "Template:This weeks featured article"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(science-policy interactions)
(Flood risk analysis study at the German Bight Coast)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Science-Policy Interaction==
+
==Flood risk analysis study at the German Bight Coast==
  
[[Image:Knowledgecycle.JPG|thumb|400px|right|Figure: The Knowledge Cycle: an idealistic conceptual model of Science-Policy Interaction.]]
+
[[Image:Study_area.jpg|thumb|300px|left|'''Figure 1: Map and coastal defence structure of the pilot site St. Peter-Ording.''']]
  
The Coastal Wiki contains much policy relevant information. Nevertheless, policy makers often complain about a lack of policy relevant research results and scientists often complain about the ignorance of policy makers of their policy relevant research results. Bridging the gap between policy and science is an issue which has triggered intensive debates over many years. No simple recipes have emerged. This article highlights some major causes of poor science-policy interaction and is intended as a help to avoid obvious pitfalls. It is more relevant for environmental and social sciences than for fundamental research.
+
The [[Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (2007) | 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] (IPCC 2007<ref>IPCC (2007): Climate change 2007: The physical science basis - Summary for policymakers. Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Genf, 21 p.</ref>) made evident that an ongoing global [[climate change]] will cause increased storminess and [[sea level rise]] in coastal zones. There is little doubt that the North Sea will also be affected by an accelerating rise of the sea-level, an increase in extreme weather events and a greater tidal range. In order to be prepared for future conditions, prevention measures have to be improved and methodologies to assess and manage upcoming risks have to be further developed. As there are still deficits in assessing the full range of [[flood]] impacts, new approaches have been developed for hazard analysis, [[vulnerability]] assessment, and flood risk management in the framework of the EU-project [http://www.floodsite.net FLOOD''site''] (Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies). In order to apply some of these new methodologies, a pilot site application was conducted for the community of St. Peter-Ording at the German North Sea Coast combining failure probabilities of the [[coastal defence]] system with micro-scale socio-economic vulnerability analysis.

Revision as of 12:54, 12 November 2008

Flood risk analysis study at the German Bight Coast

Figure 1: Map and coastal defence structure of the pilot site St. Peter-Ording.
The 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC 2007[1]) made evident that an ongoing global climate change will cause increased storminess and sea level rise in coastal zones. There is little doubt that the North Sea will also be affected by an accelerating rise of the sea-level, an increase in extreme weather events and a greater tidal range. In order to be prepared for future conditions, prevention measures have to be improved and methodologies to assess and manage upcoming risks have to be further developed. As there are still deficits in assessing the full range of flood impacts, new approaches have been developed for hazard analysis, vulnerability assessment, and flood risk management in the framework of the EU-project FLOODsite (Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies). In order to apply some of these new methodologies, a pilot site application was conducted for the community of St. Peter-Ording at the German North Sea Coast combining failure probabilities of the coastal defence system with micro-scale socio-economic vulnerability analysis.
  1. IPCC (2007): Climate change 2007: The physical science basis - Summary for policymakers. Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Genf, 21 p.