Difference between revisions of "Nutrient analysers"
Dronkers J (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | This article discusses two types of | + | This article discusses two types of analyzers to measure nutrients: a wet chemical analyzer and an optical nitrate analyzer. A nutrient analyzer is an example of an [[oceanographic instrument]] to measure the concentration of certain [[nutrient]]s (e.g. nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, phosphate and silicate) [[in situ]]. A section on recent (2020) advances in nutrient sensing has been added at the end of the article. |
Back to [[Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters]] | Back to [[Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters]] | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
Parameters limiting the deployment time of wet-chemical analyzers are reagent consumption, reagent degradation time, available electrical energy (batteries) and [[biofouling]]. | Parameters limiting the deployment time of wet-chemical analyzers are reagent consumption, reagent degradation time, available electrical energy (batteries) and [[biofouling]]. | ||
| − | A distinct advantage of wet-chemical analyzers is their capability to conduct [[in situ]] calibrations by | + | A distinct advantage of wet-chemical analyzers is their capability to conduct [[in situ]] calibrations by feeding a blank or standard solution of known concentration into the analyzer instead of the sample. Any instrument drift can be detected and the measurements can be corrected for the drift. |
| − | [[Nutrient]]s that can be measured [[in situ]] include dissolved nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, phosphate, and silicate | + | [[Nutrient]]s that can be measured [[in situ]] include dissolved nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, phosphate, and silicate. |
==Optical nitrate analyzers== | ==Optical nitrate analyzers== | ||
Optical nitrate analyzers use the property of dissolved nitrate to absorb ultraviolet light. The instrument consists of a light source (deuterium lamp of flash lamp), collimating optics, a light path through the sample water, and a spectrometer with a photo detector. The resulting absorption spectra have to be analyzed (either by an on-board computer or after data recovery) as other constituents in the seawater also absorb ultraviolet light. (For details see Johnson & Colleti (2002<ref>Johnson, K.S., Coletti, L.J., 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean. Deep-Sea Research I 49, 1291-1305.</ref>)) | Optical nitrate analyzers use the property of dissolved nitrate to absorb ultraviolet light. The instrument consists of a light source (deuterium lamp of flash lamp), collimating optics, a light path through the sample water, and a spectrometer with a photo detector. The resulting absorption spectra have to be analyzed (either by an on-board computer or after data recovery) as other constituents in the seawater also absorb ultraviolet light. (For details see Johnson & Colleti (2002<ref>Johnson, K.S., Coletti, L.J., 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean. Deep-Sea Research I 49, 1291-1305.</ref>)) | ||
| − | Optical nitrate analyzers do not require any chemical reagents and have a very fast response time (on the order of 1 s) making them very suitable for measurements conducted during profiling work, or those done on towed vehicles and AUV's. The detection limitations depend on the length of the optical absorption path Generally, these instruments are not well suited for low nitrate concentrations (< 1 umol). | + | Optical nitrate analyzers do not require any chemical reagents and have a very fast response time (on the order of 1 s) making them very suitable for measurements conducted during profiling work, or those done on towed vehicles and AUV's. The detection limitations depend on the length of the optical absorption path. Generally, these instruments are not well suited for low nitrate concentrations (< 1 umol). |
The deployment time of the optical instruments is limited by the availability of electrical energy (batteries) and [[biofouling]] (though for some instruments anti-biofouling measures can be added). | The deployment time of the optical instruments is limited by the availability of electrical energy (batteries) and [[biofouling]] (though for some instruments anti-biofouling measures can be added). | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | |||
* [[Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters]] | * [[Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters]] | ||
* [[Light fields and optics in coastal waters]] | * [[Light fields and optics in coastal waters]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Further reading=== | ===Further reading=== | ||
| − | * Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K. | + | * Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K. and Erhardt, M. (eds.) 1999. Methods of Seawater Analysis, Wiley-VCH, 600 pp., ISBN: 978-3527295890 |
| − | * Hanson, A.K. | + | * Hanson, A.K. and Donaghay, P.L. 1998. Micro- to fine-scale chemical gradients and layers in stratified coastal waters. Oceanography 11(1): 10-17. |
| − | * Johnson, K.S., J.A. | + | * Johnson, K.S., Needoba, J.A., Riser, S.C. and Showers, W.J. 2007. Chemical Sensor Networks for the Aquatic Environment, Chem. Rev. 107: 623-640. |
| + | * Chen, X., Zhou, G., Mao, S. and Chen, J. 2018. Rapid detection of nutrients with electronic sensors: a review. Environmental Science: Nano 5: 837-862. | ||
| + | * Mahmud, M.A.P., Ejeian, F., Azadi, S., Myers, M., Pejcic, B., Abbassi, R., Razmjou, A. and Asadnia, M. 2020. Recent progress in sensing nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, and ammonium in aquatic environment. Chemosphere 259, 127492 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Update 2020 of developments in nutrient analyzers== | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | The highly recommended review of Mahmud et al. (2020) highlights recent improvements in aquatic chemical sensors to monitor nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>), nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>), ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), and phosphate (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3-</sup>) ion concentrations in water. The review critically analyses and compares the performance of these chemical sensors with a particular emphasis on their capability for long-term in situ (sea)water monitoring. | ||
| + | It discusses the following topics: | ||
| + | * Sensors for detection of nitrate | ||
| + | **Electrochemical sensors for detection of nitrate | ||
| + | ***Nitrate potentiometric sensors | ||
| + | ***Nitrate amperometric/voltammetric sensors | ||
| + | **Optical sensors for nitrate detection (UV spectrophotometry) | ||
| + | *Sensors for detection of nitrite | ||
| + | **Electrochemical sensors for ditection of nitrite | ||
| + | ***Nitrite potentiometric sensors | ||
| + | ***Nitrite amperometric/voltammetric sensors | ||
| + | ***impedimetric/conductometric sensors | ||
| + | **Optical sensors for nitrite detection | ||
| + | *Sensors for detection of phosphate | ||
| + | **Electrochemical sensors for detection of phosphate | ||
| + | ***Phosphate potentiometric sensors | ||
| + | ***Phosphate amperometric/voltammetric sensors | ||
| + | ***Phosphate impedimetric/conductimetric sensors | ||
| + | **Optical sensors for phosphate detection | ||
| + | *Sensors for detection of ammonium | ||
| + | **Electrochemical sensors for ditection of ammonium | ||
| + | ***Ammonium potentiometric sensors | ||
| + | ***Ammonium amperometric/voltammetric sensors | ||
| + | ***Ammonium impedometric/conductimetric sensors | ||
| + | **Optical sensors for ammonium detection | ||
| + | The authors point to the following promising developments in nutrient sensor technology: | ||
| + | For nitrate sensing: devices based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet%E2%80%93visible_spectroscopy UV spectrometry]; for nitrite sensing: devices based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISFET ion-selective field-effect transistor systems]; for phosphate sensing: devices based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems microelectromechanical systems]; for ammonium sensing: devices based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_field-effect_transistor chemical field-effect transistor systems]. | ||
| + | Another major development is the use of graphene-based materials that present exceptional specific surface area. Electrodes using these materials have a higher density of sensing elements and greater efficiency of sensing, which is particularly important for monitoring trace levels of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems<ref> Zhu, C., Du, D., Lin, Y. 2017. Graphene-like 2D nanomaterial-based biointerfaces for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 89 (1): 43-55</ref>. | ||
| + | Major issues still requiring further research and development are: (1) calibration-free sensing (2) improved selectivity to specific nutrients, and (3) biofouling prevention and resistance to biofouling. | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
{{2Authors | {{2Authors | ||
| Line 58: | Line 84: | ||
|AuthorFullName2=Prien, Ralf}} | |AuthorFullName2=Prien, Ralf}} | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Coastal and marine observation and monitoring]] |
| − | + | [[Category:Observation of chemical parameters]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[Category: | ||
Latest revision as of 20:30, 16 January 2021
This article discusses two types of analyzers to measure nutrients: a wet chemical analyzer and an optical nitrate analyzer. A nutrient analyzer is an example of an oceanographic instrument to measure the concentration of certain nutrients (e.g. nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, phosphate and silicate) in situ. A section on recent (2020) advances in nutrient sensing has been added at the end of the article.
Back to Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters
Contents
Introduction
Nutrient analyzers are oceanographic instruments, which measure the concentration of certain nutrients in situ. While most measurements of nutrients are still made by taking water samples for later analysis in the lab, a variety of in situ instruments have become available that automatically measure nutrient concentrations at pre-programmed intervals. These instruments allow a much higher temporal resolution of measurements than what can be achieved by taking samples.
Most of the nutrient analyzers are based on proven wet-chemical laboratory analysis methods. In recent years, nitrate analyzers, based on the absorbance of ultraviolet light by nitrate in water, have been introduced.
Wet chemical analyzers
A variety of wet chemical nutrient analyzers exist on the market. These analyzers draw in sample water, which is then mixed with a reagent (or reagents). The resulting solution develops an attributive property (e.g. color complex or fluorescence) depending on the concentration of the target analyte, which is then measured either in an absorption cell (color complex) or by a light source and photodetector (fluorescence). In some cases, heating of the solution is required to speed up the development.
Depending on the chemical protocols followed (i.e. if heating and/or pre-concentration steps are needed), the time response (time between independent measurements) is on the order of a few seconds to minutes.
Parameters limiting the deployment time of wet-chemical analyzers are reagent consumption, reagent degradation time, available electrical energy (batteries) and biofouling.
A distinct advantage of wet-chemical analyzers is their capability to conduct in situ calibrations by feeding a blank or standard solution of known concentration into the analyzer instead of the sample. Any instrument drift can be detected and the measurements can be corrected for the drift.
Nutrients that can be measured in situ include dissolved nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, phosphate, and silicate.
Optical nitrate analyzers
Optical nitrate analyzers use the property of dissolved nitrate to absorb ultraviolet light. The instrument consists of a light source (deuterium lamp of flash lamp), collimating optics, a light path through the sample water, and a spectrometer with a photo detector. The resulting absorption spectra have to be analyzed (either by an on-board computer or after data recovery) as other constituents in the seawater also absorb ultraviolet light. (For details see Johnson & Colleti (2002[1]))
Optical nitrate analyzers do not require any chemical reagents and have a very fast response time (on the order of 1 s) making them very suitable for measurements conducted during profiling work, or those done on towed vehicles and AUV's. The detection limitations depend on the length of the optical absorption path. Generally, these instruments are not well suited for low nitrate concentrations (< 1 umol).
The deployment time of the optical instruments is limited by the availability of electrical energy (batteries) and biofouling (though for some instruments anti-biofouling measures can be added).
See also
- Instruments and sensors to measure environmental parameters
- Light fields and optics in coastal waters
Further reading
- Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K. and Erhardt, M. (eds.) 1999. Methods of Seawater Analysis, Wiley-VCH, 600 pp., ISBN: 978-3527295890
- Hanson, A.K. and Donaghay, P.L. 1998. Micro- to fine-scale chemical gradients and layers in stratified coastal waters. Oceanography 11(1): 10-17.
- Johnson, K.S., Needoba, J.A., Riser, S.C. and Showers, W.J. 2007. Chemical Sensor Networks for the Aquatic Environment, Chem. Rev. 107: 623-640.
- Chen, X., Zhou, G., Mao, S. and Chen, J. 2018. Rapid detection of nutrients with electronic sensors: a review. Environmental Science: Nano 5: 837-862.
- Mahmud, M.A.P., Ejeian, F., Azadi, S., Myers, M., Pejcic, B., Abbassi, R., Razmjou, A. and Asadnia, M. 2020. Recent progress in sensing nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, and ammonium in aquatic environment. Chemosphere 259, 127492
Update 2020 of developments in nutrient analyzers
The highly recommended review of Mahmud et al. (2020) highlights recent improvements in aquatic chemical sensors to monitor nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-), ammonium (NH4+), and phosphate (PO43-) ion concentrations in water. The review critically analyses and compares the performance of these chemical sensors with a particular emphasis on their capability for long-term in situ (sea)water monitoring.
It discusses the following topics:
- Sensors for detection of nitrate
- Electrochemical sensors for detection of nitrate
- Nitrate potentiometric sensors
- Nitrate amperometric/voltammetric sensors
- Optical sensors for nitrate detection (UV spectrophotometry)
- Electrochemical sensors for detection of nitrate
- Sensors for detection of nitrite
- Electrochemical sensors for ditection of nitrite
- Nitrite potentiometric sensors
- Nitrite amperometric/voltammetric sensors
- impedimetric/conductometric sensors
- Optical sensors for nitrite detection
- Electrochemical sensors for ditection of nitrite
- Sensors for detection of phosphate
- Electrochemical sensors for detection of phosphate
- Phosphate potentiometric sensors
- Phosphate amperometric/voltammetric sensors
- Phosphate impedimetric/conductimetric sensors
- Optical sensors for phosphate detection
- Electrochemical sensors for detection of phosphate
- Sensors for detection of ammonium
- Electrochemical sensors for ditection of ammonium
- Ammonium potentiometric sensors
- Ammonium amperometric/voltammetric sensors
- Ammonium impedometric/conductimetric sensors
- Optical sensors for ammonium detection
- Electrochemical sensors for ditection of ammonium
The authors point to the following promising developments in nutrient sensor technology: For nitrate sensing: devices based on UV spectrometry; for nitrite sensing: devices based on ion-selective field-effect transistor systems; for phosphate sensing: devices based on microelectromechanical systems; for ammonium sensing: devices based on chemical field-effect transistor systems. Another major development is the use of graphene-based materials that present exceptional specific surface area. Electrodes using these materials have a higher density of sensing elements and greater efficiency of sensing, which is particularly important for monitoring trace levels of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems[2]. Major issues still requiring further research and development are: (1) calibration-free sensing (2) improved selectivity to specific nutrients, and (3) biofouling prevention and resistance to biofouling.
References
- ↑ Johnson, K.S., Coletti, L.J., 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean. Deep-Sea Research I 49, 1291-1305.
- ↑ Zhu, C., Du, D., Lin, Y. 2017. Graphene-like 2D nanomaterial-based biointerfaces for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 89 (1): 43-55
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
