Difference between revisions of "Possible causes for breading failure in common terns"
(→Mogelijke oorzaken van slecht broedsucces in de visdiefkolonie bij terneuzen. Stand van zaken en aanbevelingen - 2003) |
Dronkers J (talk | contribs) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Image: tern met harring.jpg|thumb|left|250px| <div style="text-align: center;"> Common tern © RIKZ (M. Hoekstein) | [[Image: tern met harring.jpg|thumb|left|250px| <div style="text-align: center;"> Common tern © RIKZ (M. Hoekstein) | ||
</div>]] | </div>]] | ||
Line 6: | Line 4: | ||
<u>'''Context of the study'''</u> | <u>'''Context of the study'''</u> | ||
− | Since 1997 the Dutch Coastal and Marine institute (RIKZ) monitors the | + | Since 1997 the Dutch Coastal and Marine institute (RIKZ) monitors the breading birds of the Delta area. One of these breading birds is the common tern. In 1994 the colony in Terneuzen was struck by serious signs of illness, while the other colonies in the delta area remained healthy. The number of breading couples decreased strongly, and the breading outcome was terrible: eggs didn't hatch, young birds were diseased and suffered mass casualties. |
− | In 1999 the signs of illness vanished and the number of breading couples increased again. However, after 2000, the eggs started to show anomalies (small cracks or bulges), which indicated that the population still hadn't recovered.<ref>http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module= | + | In 1999 the signs of illness vanished and the number of breading couples increased again. However, after 2000, the eggs started to show anomalies (small cracks or bulges), which indicated that the population still hadn't recovered.<ref name = pub>[http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module=ref&refid=115476 van den Heuvel-Greve, M.J.; Hoekstein, M.S.J.; Lefèvre, F.O.B.; Meininger, P.J.; Vethaak, A.D. (2003). Mogelijke oorzaken van slecht broedsucces in de visdiefkolonie bij Terneuzen; Stand van zaken en aanbevelingen. Rapport RIKZ, 2003.037: Middelburg, the Netherlands. 38 pp.]</ref> |
+ | [[Image:damaged egg.jpg|thumb|right|250px| <div style="text-align: center;"> Dented egg © RIKZ (M. van den Heuvel - Greve) | ||
+ | </div>]] | ||
'''<u>Content of the study</u>''' | '''<u>Content of the study</u>''' | ||
This study investigated possible causes (both ecological as chemical) for the problems in the common tern colony of Terneuzen. | This study investigated possible causes (both ecological as chemical) for the problems in the common tern colony of Terneuzen. | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
<u>'''Main results of the study'''</u> | <u>'''Main results of the study'''</u> | ||
− | The study eliminated 2 of 3 hypothetic causes: namely infection by viruses or bacteria and suffocation by certain plants. This leaves chemicals as the only potential cause. Three groups of chemicals have been encountered in higher concentrations in the Terneuzen colony than in other colonies: [[organotin]] | + | The study eliminated 2 of 3 hypothetic causes: namely infection by viruses or bacteria and suffocation by certain plants. This leaves chemicals as the only potential cause. Three groups of chemicals have been encountered in higher concentrations in the Terneuzen colony than in other colonies: [[organotin compounds]], [[PBDE|PBDEs]] and "unidentified substances". However further research is necessary to determine which of these 3 groups of substances caused the problems of the common tern colony. <ref name = pub>[http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module=ref&refid=115476 van den Heuvel-Greve, M.J.; Hoekstein, M.S.J.; Lefèvre, F.O.B.; Meininger, P.J.; Vethaak, A.D. (2003). Mogelijke oorzaken van slecht broedsucces in de visdiefkolonie bij Terneuzen; Stand van zaken en aanbevelingen. Rapport RIKZ, 2003.037: Middelburg, the Netherlands. 38 pp.]</ref> |
− | |||
− | |||
As part of the [http://www.vliz.be/projects/inram/ INRAM] project, the eggs of the Belgian common tern colony near Zee-Brugge are also being monitored for contaminants. You can find more information on this through this [http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module=dataset&dasid=1357 link] | As part of the [http://www.vliz.be/projects/inram/ INRAM] project, the eggs of the Belgian common tern colony near Zee-Brugge are also being monitored for contaminants. You can find more information on this through this [http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module=dataset&dasid=1357 link] | ||
Line 24: | Line 21: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{author | ||
+ | |AuthorID=19826 | ||
+ | |AuthorFullName=Daphnis De Pooter | ||
+ | |AuthorName=Daphnisd}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Ecotoxicology]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Coastal and marine pollution]] |
Latest revision as of 18:53, 5 November 2019
Context of the study
Since 1997 the Dutch Coastal and Marine institute (RIKZ) monitors the breading birds of the Delta area. One of these breading birds is the common tern. In 1994 the colony in Terneuzen was struck by serious signs of illness, while the other colonies in the delta area remained healthy. The number of breading couples decreased strongly, and the breading outcome was terrible: eggs didn't hatch, young birds were diseased and suffered mass casualties. In 1999 the signs of illness vanished and the number of breading couples increased again. However, after 2000, the eggs started to show anomalies (small cracks or bulges), which indicated that the population still hadn't recovered.[1]
Content of the study
This study investigated possible causes (both ecological as chemical) for the problems in the common tern colony of Terneuzen.
Main results of the study
The study eliminated 2 of 3 hypothetic causes: namely infection by viruses or bacteria and suffocation by certain plants. This leaves chemicals as the only potential cause. Three groups of chemicals have been encountered in higher concentrations in the Terneuzen colony than in other colonies: organotin compounds, PBDEs and "unidentified substances". However further research is necessary to determine which of these 3 groups of substances caused the problems of the common tern colony. [1]
As part of the INRAM project, the eggs of the Belgian common tern colony near Zee-Brugge are also being monitored for contaminants. You can find more information on this through this link
References
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|