Difference between revisions of "Marine Protected Areas in Europe"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
 
This article deals with ''Marine Protected Areas'' (MPAs) in Europe. It is structured in two main parts. In the first section, the reader obtains background information about Marine Protected Areas in general which includes relevant definitions and introduces the different types of MPAs. Furthermore, the main ecological as well as socio-economic benefits of MPAs are summarized. The second part of the article focuses on the implementation of Marine Protected Areas in Europe. An overview of the most important international/regional as well as European legislation relating to MPAs is given. In addition, the designation process of MPAs under the Birds and Habitats Directive is briefly described and the current status of marine Natura 2000 sites is outlined.
 
This article deals with ''Marine Protected Areas'' (MPAs) in Europe. It is structured in two main parts. In the first section, the reader obtains background information about Marine Protected Areas in general which includes relevant definitions and introduces the different types of MPAs. Furthermore, the main ecological as well as socio-economic benefits of MPAs are summarized. The second part of the article focuses on the implementation of Marine Protected Areas in Europe. An overview of the most important international/regional as well as European legislation relating to MPAs is given. In addition, the designation process of MPAs under the Birds and Habitats Directive is briefly described and the current status of marine Natura 2000 sites is outlined.
 
[[Image:Marine_Europe.jpg|thumb|right|396px|Figure 1: Marine Environments in Europe, © A. Huth]]
 
[[Image:Marine_Europe.jpg|thumb|right|396px|Figure 1: Marine Environments in Europe, © A. Huth]]
Line 5: Line 7:
 
In Europe as well as in other parts of the world, concerns about the continuing decline of [[Marine Biodiversity|marine biodiversity]] have risen. Independent reports about losses in marine species, depleted populations of commercial fish stocks and increasing human pressures on marine ecosystems demand an immediate management response.<ref name="Millennium"> Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Chapter 18: Marine Fisheries Systems. Retrieved February, 2010 from:
 
In Europe as well as in other parts of the world, concerns about the continuing decline of [[Marine Biodiversity|marine biodiversity]] have risen. Independent reports about losses in marine species, depleted populations of commercial fish stocks and increasing human pressures on marine ecosystems demand an immediate management response.<ref name="Millennium"> Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Chapter 18: Marine Fisheries Systems. Retrieved February, 2010 from:
 
http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.287.aspx.pdf
 
http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.287.aspx.pdf
−
</ref> <ref name="ICES"> ICES (2003). Environmental Status of the European Seas. Retrieved February 4th, 2010, from
+
</ref> .  
−
http://www.ices.dk/reports/germanqsr/23222_ICES_Report_samme.pdf
+
Nevertheless, at present the world oceans are still seriously underprotected. According to a 2017 inventory, an estimated 6.35% of the ocean was protected. However, only just over 1.89% was covered by exclusively no-take MPAs that do not allow any fishing, mining, drilling, or other extractive activities<ref name="MarinePA"> IUCN (2017). Marine protected areas and climate change. https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/marine-protected-areas-and-climate-change</ref>. According to the [https://mpatlas.org/zones/ Marine Protection Atlas] about 2.7% of the world oceans was fully protected in 2020. This is far from the commitments of States made in relation to the Convention on Biological Diversity’s (CBD) Aichi Target 11 of 10% MPA coverage by 2020<ref name=Aichi>CBD Aichi Targets https://www.cbd.int/aichi-targets/target/11</ref>, and even further from the recommendations made at the IUCN World Parks Congress 2014 that at least 30% no-take MPA coverage worldwide is needed<ref name="MarinePA"/>. Since it is commonly acknowledged that marine biodiversity plays a fundamental role in supporting a wide range of [[EcoSystem services|ecosystem goods and services]], efforts have been made to conserve ecologically valuable marine samples. Today Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are recognized by most countries and regions in the world as an important instrument to conserve marine ecosystems. In Europe the implementation of MPAs is driven by several international, EU and regional obligations and initiatives.   
−
</ref> Nevertheless, at present the world oceans are still seriously underprotected. It is estimated that less than 1% of the earth’s ocean possess a protected status.<ref name="MarinePA"> IUCN (2009). Marine PAs as a priority. Retrieved February 1st, 2010, from:
 
−
http://www.iucn.org/about/union/commissions/wcpa/wcpa_what/wcpa_marine/
 
−
</ref> Since it is commonly acknowledged that marine biodiversity plays a fundamental role in supporting a wide range of [[EcoSystem services|ecosystem goods and services]], efforts have been made to conserve ecologically valuable marine samples. Today Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are recognized by most countries and regions in the world as an important instrument to conserve marine ecosystems. In Europe the implementation of MPAs is driven by several international, EU and regional obligations and initiatives.   
 
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
−
A Marine Protected Area (MPA) is a clearly defined zone in the sea which by some level of restriction protects living, non-living, cultural, and/or historic resources from harmful human impacts and environmental pollution. MPAs often encompass areas of high ecological value whose marine biodiversity is protected and preserved for the benefits of present and future generations. Marine Protected Areas are perceived as instruments for improving both fishery management and marine environmental protection. Besides protecting the respective marine ecosystem’s structure, function and integrity, MPAs also can support more sustainable fishery management.<ref name="UNEPWCMC">UNEP – WCMC (2008). National and Regional Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Review of Progress. Cambridge: UNEP – WCMC. Retrieved February 1st, 2010, from:
+
A Marine Protected Area (MPA) is a clearly defined zone in the sea which by some level of restriction protects living, non-living, cultural, and/or historic resources from harmful human impacts and environmental pollution. MPAs often encompass areas of high ecological value whose marine biodiversity is protected and preserved for the benefits of present and future generations. Marine Protected Areas are perceived as instruments for improving both fishery management and marine environmental protection. Besides protecting the respective marine ecosystem’s structure, function and integrity, MPAs also can support more sustainable fishery management.<ref name="UNEPWCMC">UNEP – WCMC (2008). National and Regional Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Review of Progress. Cambridge: UNEP – WCMC. https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/national-and-regional-networks-of-marine-protected-areas-a-review-of-progress</ref>
−
http://www.unep-wcmc.org/oneocean/pdf/MPA%20report%20FINAL.pdf</ref>
 
  
 
Several definitions of Marine Protected Areas have been formulated and applied in different conservation and management contexts. The internationally most commonly cited definition is the following:
 
Several definitions of Marine Protected Areas have been formulated and applied in different conservation and management contexts. The internationally most commonly cited definition is the following:
Line 38: Line 36:
  
 
Marine Protected Areas protect marine ecosystem structure, function and integrity. Critical marine habitats and their natural communities, composition and functioning can be preserved. In addition, MPAs allow for the recovery of depleted populations, protect spawning populations and safeguard genetic resources and biodiversity.  
 
Marine Protected Areas protect marine ecosystem structure, function and integrity. Critical marine habitats and their natural communities, composition and functioning can be preserved. In addition, MPAs allow for the recovery of depleted populations, protect spawning populations and safeguard genetic resources and biodiversity.  
−
Besides having various positive effects on nature, MPAs also can directly be profitable for human beings. Marine Protected Areas foster sustainable fishery management and reduce overfishing. MPAs offer undisturbed spawning sites and enhance eggs and larvae production. The abundance of overfished stocks inside as well as outside of the protected area increases. Consequently in the long run local fishery yields can increase leading to higher incomes of local fishermen. Furthermore, MPAs can constitute ideal research grounds for science enabling an improvement in the understanding of marine ecosystems. MPAs can provide possible long-term monitoring sites for data collection. Also marine [[Ecotourism|ecotourism]] that is compatible with zoned MPAs can be a very profitable leading to additional income for local inhabitants.<ref> Angula-Valdés, J., Hatcher, B. (2009). A new typology of benefits derived from marine protected areas. Marine Policy, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.002
+
Besides having various positive effects on nature, MPAs also can directly be profitable for human beings. Marine Protected Areas foster sustainable fishery management and reduce overfishing. MPAs offer undisturbed spawning sites and enhance eggs and larvae production. The abundance of overfished stocks inside as well as outside of the protected area increases. Consequently in the long run local fishery yields can increase leading to higher incomes of local fishermen. Furthermore, MPAs can constitute ideal research grounds for science enabling an improvement in the understanding of marine ecosystems. MPAs can provide possible long-term monitoring sites for data collection. Also marine [[Ecotourism|ecotourism]] that is compatible with zoned MPAs can be a very profitable leading to additional income for local inhabitants<ref> Angula-Valdés, J., Hatcher, B. (2010). A new typology of benefits derived from marine protected areas. Marine Policy 34: 635-644</ref>.
−
</ref> <ref> Cardigos, F (n.d.) Marine Protected Areas: an essential tool for the Future European Maritime Policy. European Regional Directorate for Environment. Presentation. Retrieved January 28th 2010, from: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/conferences/od2007/doc/presentations/d/PPT_Frederico_CARDIGOS_10D17.ppt</ref>
 
  
 
==Legislation relating to MPAs in Europe==
 
==Legislation relating to MPAs in Europe==
Line 45: Line 42:
  
 
===International/Regional Legislation relating to MPAs in Europe===
 
===International/Regional Legislation relating to MPAs in Europe===
−
The following international or regional agreements, conventions and treaties deal with marine nature conservation and apply to some or all Member States of the EU. In theory these international/regional instruments are legally binding for contracting parties, however in practice, their effectiveness is extremely dependent on the political commitment for national implementation.<ref>IEEP (2008). Marine Protected Areas in Europe and the United States. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy.</ref>
+
The following international or regional agreements, conventions and treaties deal with marine nature conservation and apply to some or all Member States of the EU. In theory these international/regional instruments are legally binding for contracting parties, however in practice, their effectiveness is extremely dependent on the political commitment for national implementation<ref>IEEP (2008). Marine Protected Areas in Europe and the United States. A report from the transatlantic platform for action on the global environment. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy.</ref>
  
 
====Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)====
 
====Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)====
−
In 2004 the [[Convention on Biological Diversity]] adopted a Programme of Work on protected areas which included an objective of establishment and maintenance for marine areas by 2012.The CBD aims to build up a global network of comprehensive, effectively managed and ecologically representative national and regional systems of marine protected areas.
+
The [[Convention on Biological Diversity]] aims to build up a global network of comprehensive, effectively managed and ecologically representative national and regional systems of marine protected areas. The strategic plan 2011-2020 formulated the following target: by 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape <ref name=Aichi/>.
  
 
====Ramsar Convention====
 
====Ramsar Convention====
−
The [[Ramsar Convention for Wetlands|Ramsar Convention]] obliges contracting parties to carry out measures for the conservation of wetlands. According to the Ramsar definition, wetlands can encompass near-shore marine areas.<ref> Ramsar Convention (1987). Convention on Wetlands of International Importance. Retrieved February, 10th, 2010 from:
+
The [[Ramsar Convention for Wetlands|Ramsar Convention]] obliges contracting parties to carry out measures for the conservation of wetlands. According to the Ramsar definition, wetlands can encompass near-shore marine areas<ref> Ramsar Convention (1987). Convention on Wetlands of International Importance. https://www.ramsar.org/about-the-convention-on-wetlands-0</ref>.
−
http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-texts-convention-on/main/ramsar/1-31-38%5E20671_4000_0__</ref>
 
  
 
====Bern Convention====
 
====Bern Convention====
−
The [[Bern Convention]] aims to conserve wild flora and fauna and their natural habitats. Parties to the Bern Convention are required to nominate protected sites, which make up the ‘Emerald Network’.<ref>Council of Europe (n.d.). Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. Retrieved February 9th, 2010, from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/nature/Bern/default_en.asp</ref>
+
The [[Bern Convention]] aims to conserve wild flora and fauna and their natural habitats. Parties to the Bern Convention are required to nominate protected sites, which make up the ‘Emerald Network’.<ref>Council of Europe (n.d.). Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. https://rm.coe.int/1680078aff </ref>
  
−
====Ospar and Helcom====
+
====OSPAR and HELCOM====
 
The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment in the Northeast Atlantic ([[OSPAR Convention (Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic) and OSPAR Commission|OSPAR]]) includes a Strategy to protect and conserve marine biological diversity which aims to restore damaged marine areas.
 
The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment in the Northeast Atlantic ([[OSPAR Convention (Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic) and OSPAR Commission|OSPAR]]) includes a Strategy to protect and conserve marine biological diversity which aims to restore damaged marine areas.
 
The [[HELCOM (Helsinki Commission) and Helsinki Convention|Helsinki Convention]] (Helcom) contains provisions for the establishment of Baltic Sea Protected Areas (BSPAs) for the protection of species and natural habitats of the marine and coastal ecosystems of the Baltic Sea.
 
The [[HELCOM (Helsinki Commission) and Helsinki Convention|Helsinki Convention]] (Helcom) contains provisions for the establishment of Baltic Sea Protected Areas (BSPAs) for the protection of species and natural habitats of the marine and coastal ecosystems of the Baltic Sea.
Line 68: Line 64:
  
 
====Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)====
 
====Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)====
−
[[EU Common Fisheries Policy|The CFP Regulation]] (2371/2002) provides for the establishment of ‘zones and/or periods in which fishing activities are prohibited or restricted as well as specific measures to reduce environmental impacts of fishing. The basic regulation does not require Member States to develop MPAs, but rather puts in place a legal framework through which they could be established.
+
[[EU Common Fisheries Policy|The CFP Regulation]] provides for the establishment of zones and/or periods in which fishing activities are prohibited or restricted as well as specific measures to reduce environmental impacts of fishing<ref>CFP Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32013R1380 </ref>: "The Union shall, while taking due account of existing conservation areas, endeavour to establish protected areas due to their biological sensitivity, including areas where there is clear evidence of heavy concentrations of fish below minimum conservation reference size and of spawning grounds. In such areas fishing activities may be restricted or prohibited in order to contribute to the conservation of living aquatic resources and marine ecosystems. The Union shall continue to give additional protection to existing biologically sensitive areas." The basic regulation does not require Member States to develop MPAs, but rather puts in place a legal framework through which they could be established.
  
 
====Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)====
 
====Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)====
Line 77: Line 73:
  
 
==Implementation of MPAs in Europe==
 
==Implementation of MPAs in Europe==
 +
[[Image:Natura 2000 process.gif|thumb|right|450px|Figure 2: The Natura 2000 Designation Process]]
 
===Designation of MPAs under the Birds and Habitats Directive===
 
===Designation of MPAs under the Birds and Habitats Directive===
−
[[Image:Natura 2000 process.gif|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: The Natura 2000 Designation Process]]
+
In Europe the Member States of the EU which border the sea are under the Birds and Habitats Directive obliged to designate marine protected sites which will ultimately contribute to a coherent European ecological network of protected areas known as [[Birds Directive, Habitats Directive, NATURA 2000|Natura 2000]]. The EU Guidelines Report for the “establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment” gives Member States detailed instructions on how to apply both Directives properly. Member States under the Birds Directive are required to identify and select on a scientific basis (e.g. ornithological criteria) Special Protection Areas (SPAs) which represent the most suitable national territories for protection. Under the Habitats Directive Member States have to elaborate (according to specific scientific criteria) on a list of proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCI) which is to be transmitted to the European Commission. After the adoption of the list by the European Commission, Member States can then designate Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) <ref> European Commission (2007). Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives.  
−
In Europe the 22 Member States of the EU which border the sea are under the Birds and Habitats Directive obliged to designate marine protected sites which will ultimately contribute to a coherent European ecological network of protected areas known as [[Birds Directive, Habitats Directive, NATURA 2000|Natura 2000]]. The EU Guidelines Report for the “establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment” gives Member States detailed instructions on how to apply both Directives properly. Member States under the Birds Directive are required to identify and select on a scientific basis (e.g. ornithological criteria) Special Protection Areas (SPAs) which represent the most suitable national territories for protection. Under the Habitats Directive Member States have to elaborate (according to specific scientific criteria) on a list of proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCI) which is to be transmitted to the European Commission. After the adoption of the list by the European Commission, Member States can then designate Special Areas of Conservation (SAC). <ref> European Commission (2007). Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives. Retrieved February 4th, 2010, from:
 
 
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/marine/docs/marine_guidelines.pdf
 
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/marine/docs/marine_guidelines.pdf
−
</ref>
+
</ref>.
 +
<br clear=all>
 +
 
 +
===Progress on Natura 2000 MPAs===
 +
By the end of 2009, EU Member States had designated 619 marine SPAs under the Birds Directive, covering 97,507 km². In addition, a total of 1,391 marine proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCIs), covering 131,459 km², were identified under the Habitats Directive. Most of these areas are very small (average size from Table 1, is 157 km² for SPA and 94 km² for pSCIs) and are in coastal and inshore waters, often as an extension of a terrestrial site.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In 2018, the number of MPAs of EU  Member States under the Birds and Habitats Directives (SPAs and pSCIs) has increased to 3150 covering a surface of over 550,000 km², which is about 10 % of the total marine area of the Member States. Some regions exceed the 10 % target (Greater North Sea, Baltic Sea), but other regions still stay behind<ref name=EEA2015> European Commission (2009). Natura 2000 Barometer. European Commission Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter. Number 27 December 2009. Retrieved February 2nd, 2010, from:
 +
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/nat27_en.pdf</ref>. A map is shown in Figure 3.   
  
−
===Progess on Natura 2000 MPAs===
 
−
By the end of 2009, EU Member States had designated 619 marine SPAs under the Birds Directive, covering 97,507 km². In addition, a total of 1,391 marine proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCIs), covering 131,459 km², have been identified under the Habitats Directive. Most of these areas are very small (average size from Table 1, is 157 km² for SPA and 94 km² for pSCIs) and are in coastal and inshore waters, often as an extension of a terrestrial site.
 
  
−
{|border="1" cellspacing="0"
+
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" style="font-size: 11px" align=left width=40%
−
|+'''Table 1: Numbers and areas of SPAs and pSCIs with a marine component in the European Union States (December 2009)'''
+
|+'''Table 1: Numbers and areas of SPAs and pSCIs with a marine component in the European Union States (December 2009)''' <br>
 +
<small>Source: Created according to UNIT ENV. B2, European Commission, 2009<ref name=EEA2015/>. (Comment by the author: only member states bordering the sea are listed)</small>
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=col width="20%" | Country
+
! scope=col width="8%" style="font-size: 11px" | Country
−
! scope=col width="20%" | No. SPAs
+
! scope=col width="8%" style="font-size: 11px" | No. SPAs
−
! scope=col width="20%" | Marine area km²
+
! scope=col width="8%" style="font-size: 11px" | Marine area km²
−
! scope=col width="20%" | No. pSCIs
+
! scope=col width="8%" style="font-size: 11px" | No. pSCIs
−
! scope=col width="20%" | Marine area km²
+
! scope=col width="8%" style="font-size: 11px" | Marine area km²
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Belgium
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Belgium
 
| 4
 
| 4
 
| 315
 
| 315
Line 101: Line 104:
 
| 198
 
| 198
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Bulgaria
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Bulgaria
 
| 14
 
| 14
 
| 539
 
| 539
Line 107: Line 110:
 
| 592
 
| 592
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Cyprus
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Cyprus
 
| 1
 
| 1
 
| 21
 
| 21
Line 113: Line 116:
 
| 50
 
| 50
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Denmark
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px" | Denmark
 
| 59
 
| 59
 
| 12180
 
| 12180
Line 119: Line 122:
 
| 16145
 
| 16145
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Estonia
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Estonia
 
| 27
 
| 27
 
| 6502
 
| 6502
Line 125: Line 128:
 
| 3752
 
| 3752
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Finland
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Finland
 
| 66
 
| 66
 
| 5567
 
| 5567
Line 131: Line 134:
 
| 5460
 
| 5460
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | France
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| France
 
| 73
 
| 73
 
| 33041
 
| 33041
Line 137: Line 140:
 
| 25709
 
| 25709
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Germany
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Germany
 
| 15
 
| 15
 
| 16055
 
| 16055
Line 143: Line 146:
 
| 19768
 
| 19768
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Greece
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Greece
 
| 77
 
| 77
 
| 1099
 
| 1099
Line 149: Line 152:
 
| 6344
 
| 6344
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Ireland
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Ireland
 
| 66
 
| 66
 
| 810
 
| 810
Line 155: Line 158:
 
| 6014
 
| 6014
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Italy
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Italy
 
| 45
 
| 45
 
| 2724
 
| 2724
Line 161: Line 164:
 
| 2254
 
| 2254
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Latvia
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Latvia
 
| 4
 
| 4
 
| 520
 
| 520
Line 167: Line 170:
 
| 562
 
| 562
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Lithuania
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Lithuania
 
| 1
 
| 1
 
| 171
 
| 171
Line 173: Line 176:
 
| 171
 
| 171
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Malta
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Malta
 
| 0
 
| 0
 
| 0
 
| 0
Line 179: Line 182:
 
| 8
 
| 8
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Netherlands
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Netherlands
 
| 6
 
| 6
 
| 4895
 
| 4895
Line 185: Line 188:
 
| 10857
 
| 10857
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Poland
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Poland
 
| 4
 
| 4
 
| 6490
 
| 6490
Line 191: Line 194:
 
| 3600
 
| 3600
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Portugal
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Portugal
 
| 10
 
| 10
 
| 622
 
| 622
Line 197: Line 200:
 
| 775
 
| 775
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Romania
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Romania
 
| 1
 
| 1
 
| -
 
| -
Line 203: Line 206:
 
| 1353
 
| 1353
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Slovenia
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Slovenia
 
| 1
 
| 1
 
| 3
 
| 3
Line 209: Line 212:
 
| -
 
| -
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Spain
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Spain
 
| 33
 
| 33
 
| 1034
 
| 1034
Line 215: Line 218:
 
| 7926
 
| 7926
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Sweden
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Sweden
 
| 108
 
| 108
 
| 4018
 
| 4018
Line 221: Line 224:
 
| 7512
 
| 7512
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | United Kingdom
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| United Kingdom
 
| 4
 
| 4
 
| 901
 
| 901
Line 227: Line 230:
 
| 12409
 
| 12409
 
|-
 
|-
−
! scope=row | Total
+
! scope=row style="font-size: 10px"| Total
 
| 619
 
| 619
 
| 97507
 
| 97507
Line 233: Line 236:
 
| 131459
 
| 131459
 
|}
 
|}
−
<small>Source: Created according to UNIT ENV. B2, European Commission, 2009<ref> European Commission (2009). Natura 2000 Barometer. European Commission Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter. Number 27 December 2009. Retrieved February 2nd, 2010, from:
+
 
−
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/nat27_en.pdf</ref>
+
 
−
(Comment by the author: only member states bordering the sea are listed)</small>
+
[[Image:EuropeMarineProtectedAreas2015.gif|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: Map of Marine Protected Areas designated under the Regional Sea Conventions, situation 2015. From EEA 2015<ref> Marine protected areas in Europe's seas. An overview and perspectives for the future. EEA report 3/2015</ref>]]
 +
<br clear=all>
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
In Europe the vast majority of MPAs are located in the territorial waters of the Member States. However, the European Commission demands an extension of the application of the [[Birds Directive, Habitats Directive, NATURA 2000|Natura 2000]] network to the [[Exclusive economic zone|Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)]]. There are already some offshore sites, most notably in Germany which committed in March 2005 to protect 38% of its marine waters as MPAs, and nominated ten Environmentally Sound Fishery Management Areas within its EEZ.<ref name="UNEPWCMC"/>
 
In Europe the vast majority of MPAs are located in the territorial waters of the Member States. However, the European Commission demands an extension of the application of the [[Birds Directive, Habitats Directive, NATURA 2000|Natura 2000]] network to the [[Exclusive economic zone|Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)]]. There are already some offshore sites, most notably in Germany which committed in March 2005 to protect 38% of its marine waters as MPAs, and nominated ten Environmentally Sound Fishery Management Areas within its EEZ.<ref name="UNEPWCMC"/>
  
 
==Discussion==
 
==Discussion==
−
It becomes evident that a well managed European MPA network can play a crucial role in the conservation of both marine biodiversity and ecological processes and can make a contribution to sustainable development of the coastal zone. In order to arrive at a holistic and integrative MPA management approach it is important that all relevant ecological, social and economic factors are taken into account and that [[stakeholders]] become involved in the decision-making process. As far as the implementation record of MPAs is concerned in Europe progress has been made and the number of designated Natura 2000 marine sites increased steadily. Nevertheless, for the EU’s ambitious vision (creation of a pan European corridor for the safeguarding of the life cycle of migratory species) to come true still a lot of work has to be carried out. In this context Germany’s commitment to extent its MPAs to the [[Exclusive economic zone|EEZ]] definitely marks the right direction.
+
It becomes evident that a well-managed European MPA network can play a crucial role in the conservation of both marine biodiversity and ecological processes and can make a contribution to sustainable development of the coastal zone. In order to arrive at a holistic and integrative MPA management approach it is important that all relevant ecological, social and economic factors are taken into account and that [[stakeholders]] become involved in the decision-making process. As far as the implementation record of MPAs is concerned in Europe progress has been made and the number of designated Natura 2000 marine sites has increased steadily.  
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
===Internal Links===
 
===Internal Links===
  
−
[[MPAs (Marine Protected Areas)]]<br>
+
[[Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)]]<br>
 
[[Biodiversity in the European Seas]]<br>
 
[[Biodiversity in the European Seas]]<br>
−
[[Effects of fisheries on European marine biodiversity]]
+
[[Effects of fisheries on marine biodiversity]]
  
 
===External Links===
 
===External Links===
−
 
+
:[http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/marine/index_en.htm Natura 2000 in the Marine Environment]
−
Links for information on European MPAs <br>
+
:[http://www.bfn.de/habitatmare/ German marine protected areas]
−
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/marine/index_en.htm
+
:[https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/bdc/marine-protected-areas OSPAR Marine protected areas]
−
 
+
:[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0043:EN:NOT Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora]
−
http://www.bfn.de/habitatmare/
+
:[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31979L0409:EN:NOT Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds]
−
 
 
−
http://www.ices.dk/marineworld/protectedAreas.asp
 
−
 
 
−
Link for Habitats Directive<br>
 
−
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0043:EN:NOT
 
−
 
 
−
Link for Birds Directive<br>
 
−
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31979L0409:EN:NOT
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 271: Line 269:
 
  }}
 
  }}
  
−
[[Category:Restoration of coastal and marine zones]]
+
 
−
[[Category:Coastal habitats and ecosystems in transitional waters]]
+
{{Review
−
[[Category:Coastal and marine natural environment‏‎]]
+
|name=Job Dronkers|AuthorID=120|
−
[[Category:Marine habitats and ecosystems‏‎]]
+
}}
 +
 
 
[[Category:Protected coastal and marine areas]]‏‎
 
[[Category:Protected coastal and marine areas]]‏‎
 +
[[Category:Coastal and marine ecosystems]]
 +
[[Category:Legislation and conventions]]

Latest revision as of 10:10, 25 September 2021


This article deals with Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Europe. It is structured in two main parts. In the first section, the reader obtains background information about Marine Protected Areas in general which includes relevant definitions and introduces the different types of MPAs. Furthermore, the main ecological as well as socio-economic benefits of MPAs are summarized. The second part of the article focuses on the implementation of Marine Protected Areas in Europe. An overview of the most important international/regional as well as European legislation relating to MPAs is given. In addition, the designation process of MPAs under the Birds and Habitats Directive is briefly described and the current status of marine Natura 2000 sites is outlined.

Figure 1: Marine Environments in Europe, © A. Huth

Introduction

In Europe as well as in other parts of the world, concerns about the continuing decline of marine biodiversity have risen. Independent reports about losses in marine species, depleted populations of commercial fish stocks and increasing human pressures on marine ecosystems demand an immediate management response.[1] . Nevertheless, at present the world oceans are still seriously underprotected. According to a 2017 inventory, an estimated 6.35% of the ocean was protected. However, only just over 1.89% was covered by exclusively no-take MPAs that do not allow any fishing, mining, drilling, or other extractive activities[2]. According to the Marine Protection Atlas about 2.7% of the world oceans was fully protected in 2020. This is far from the commitments of States made in relation to the Convention on Biological Diversity’s (CBD) Aichi Target 11 of 10% MPA coverage by 2020[3], and even further from the recommendations made at the IUCN World Parks Congress 2014 that at least 30% no-take MPA coverage worldwide is needed[2]. Since it is commonly acknowledged that marine biodiversity plays a fundamental role in supporting a wide range of ecosystem goods and services, efforts have been made to conserve ecologically valuable marine samples. Today Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are recognized by most countries and regions in the world as an important instrument to conserve marine ecosystems. In Europe the implementation of MPAs is driven by several international, EU and regional obligations and initiatives.

Definition

A Marine Protected Area (MPA) is a clearly defined zone in the sea which by some level of restriction protects living, non-living, cultural, and/or historic resources from harmful human impacts and environmental pollution. MPAs often encompass areas of high ecological value whose marine biodiversity is protected and preserved for the benefits of present and future generations. Marine Protected Areas are perceived as instruments for improving both fishery management and marine environmental protection. Besides protecting the respective marine ecosystem’s structure, function and integrity, MPAs also can support more sustainable fishery management.[4]

Several definitions of Marine Protected Areas have been formulated and applied in different conservation and management contexts. The internationally most commonly cited definition is the following:

“Any area of the intertidal or subtidal terrain, together with its overlying water and associated flora, fauna, historical and cultural features, which has been reserved by law or other effective means to protect part or all of the enclosed environment”[5]

Types of MPAs

Beyond the above mentioned general definition, IUCN classifies six types of marine protected areas, depending on their targets:

Category I - Protected area managed mainly for science or wilderness protection (Strict Nature Reserve/Wilderness Area);
Category II - Protected area managed mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation (National Park);
Category III - Protected area managed mainly for conservation of specific natural features (Natural Monument);
Category IV - Protected area managed mainly for conservation through management intervention (Habitat/Species Management Area);
Category V - Protected area managed mainly for landscape/seascape conservation and recreation (Protected Landscape/Seascape);
Category VI - Protected area managed mainly for the sustainable use of natural ecosystems (Managed Resource Protected Area)[5]

Benefits of MPAs

Studies show that Marine Protected Areas entail several benefits to humans as well as to nature. The main advantages can be very roughly summarized under the subsequent four categories:

  • Protection of marine ecosystem structure, function and integrity
  • Fishery management / sustainable natural resource management
  • Education and research
  • Recreation / tourism

Marine Protected Areas protect marine ecosystem structure, function and integrity. Critical marine habitats and their natural communities, composition and functioning can be preserved. In addition, MPAs allow for the recovery of depleted populations, protect spawning populations and safeguard genetic resources and biodiversity. Besides having various positive effects on nature, MPAs also can directly be profitable for human beings. Marine Protected Areas foster sustainable fishery management and reduce overfishing. MPAs offer undisturbed spawning sites and enhance eggs and larvae production. The abundance of overfished stocks inside as well as outside of the protected area increases. Consequently in the long run local fishery yields can increase leading to higher incomes of local fishermen. Furthermore, MPAs can constitute ideal research grounds for science enabling an improvement in the understanding of marine ecosystems. MPAs can provide possible long-term monitoring sites for data collection. Also marine ecotourism that is compatible with zoned MPAs can be a very profitable leading to additional income for local inhabitants[6].

Legislation relating to MPAs in Europe

In Europe several legal arrangements are relevant to the establishment of MPAs. In the subsequent section a brief overview of the most important international/regional as well as EU legislation and strategies is given.

International/Regional Legislation relating to MPAs in Europe

The following international or regional agreements, conventions and treaties deal with marine nature conservation and apply to some or all Member States of the EU. In theory these international/regional instruments are legally binding for contracting parties, however in practice, their effectiveness is extremely dependent on the political commitment for national implementation[7]

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

The Convention on Biological Diversity aims to build up a global network of comprehensive, effectively managed and ecologically representative national and regional systems of marine protected areas. The strategic plan 2011-2020 formulated the following target: by 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape [3].

Ramsar Convention

The Ramsar Convention obliges contracting parties to carry out measures for the conservation of wetlands. According to the Ramsar definition, wetlands can encompass near-shore marine areas[8].

Bern Convention

The Bern Convention aims to conserve wild flora and fauna and their natural habitats. Parties to the Bern Convention are required to nominate protected sites, which make up the ‘Emerald Network’.[9]

OSPAR and HELCOM

The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment in the Northeast Atlantic (OSPAR) includes a Strategy to protect and conserve marine biological diversity which aims to restore damaged marine areas. The Helsinki Convention (Helcom) contains provisions for the establishment of Baltic Sea Protected Areas (BSPAs) for the protection of species and natural habitats of the marine and coastal ecosystems of the Baltic Sea.

EU Legislation and Strategies relating to MPAs

In the following the most important EU legislation and strategies relating to MPAs are listed of which the first three are legally binding to all Member States.

Habitats and Birds Directives

The EU Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to designate Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) to protect some of the most threatened habitats and species across Europe. Under the EU Birds Directive (79/409/EEC) Member States are obliged to classify Special Protection Areas (SPAs) for the conservation of specifically listed bird species. The sites designated under both Directives contribute to a Europe-wide network of nature conservation protected areas known as Natura 2000.

Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)

The CFP Regulation provides for the establishment of zones and/or periods in which fishing activities are prohibited or restricted as well as specific measures to reduce environmental impacts of fishing[10]: "The Union shall, while taking due account of existing conservation areas, endeavour to establish protected areas due to their biological sensitivity, including areas where there is clear evidence of heavy concentrations of fish below minimum conservation reference size and of spawning grounds. In such areas fishing activities may be restricted or prohibited in order to contribute to the conservation of living aquatic resources and marine ecosystems. The Union shall continue to give additional protection to existing biologically sensitive areas." The basic regulation does not require Member States to develop MPAs, but rather puts in place a legal framework through which they could be established.

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC) requires Member States to put measures in place to achieve or maintain good environmental status in their waters by 2020. Under the Directive a coherent and representative network of MPAs have to be created by 2016.

Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM)

The Recommendation (2002/413) prescribes a holistic and long term perspective to managing the marine coastal environment. According to the recommendation MPAs in the coastal region are to be implemented within the context of integrated coastal zone management.

Implementation of MPAs in Europe

Figure 2: The Natura 2000 Designation Process

Designation of MPAs under the Birds and Habitats Directive

In Europe the Member States of the EU which border the sea are under the Birds and Habitats Directive obliged to designate marine protected sites which will ultimately contribute to a coherent European ecological network of protected areas known as Natura 2000. The EU Guidelines Report for the “establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment” gives Member States detailed instructions on how to apply both Directives properly. Member States under the Birds Directive are required to identify and select on a scientific basis (e.g. ornithological criteria) Special Protection Areas (SPAs) which represent the most suitable national territories for protection. Under the Habitats Directive Member States have to elaborate (according to specific scientific criteria) on a list of proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCI) which is to be transmitted to the European Commission. After the adoption of the list by the European Commission, Member States can then designate Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) [11].

Progress on Natura 2000 MPAs

By the end of 2009, EU Member States had designated 619 marine SPAs under the Birds Directive, covering 97,507 km². In addition, a total of 1,391 marine proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCIs), covering 131,459 km², were identified under the Habitats Directive. Most of these areas are very small (average size from Table 1, is 157 km² for SPA and 94 km² for pSCIs) and are in coastal and inshore waters, often as an extension of a terrestrial site.


In 2018, the number of MPAs of EU Member States under the Birds and Habitats Directives (SPAs and pSCIs) has increased to 3150 covering a surface of over 550,000 km², which is about 10 % of the total marine area of the Member States. Some regions exceed the 10 % target (Greater North Sea, Baltic Sea), but other regions still stay behind[12]. A map is shown in Figure 3.


Table 1: Numbers and areas of SPAs and pSCIs with a marine component in the European Union States (December 2009)
Source: Created according to UNIT ENV. B2, European Commission, 2009[12]. (Comment by the author: only member states bordering the sea are listed)
Country No. SPAs Marine area km² No. pSCIs Marine area km²
Belgium 4 315 2 198
Bulgaria 14 539 14 592
Cyprus 1 21 5 50
Denmark 59 12180 125 16145
Estonia 27 6502 46 3752
Finland 66 5567 98 5460
France 73 33041 132 25709
Germany 15 16055 53 19768
Greece 77 1099 114 6344
Ireland 66 810 97 6014
Italy 45 2724 162 2254
Latvia 4 520 6 562
Lithuania 1 171 2 171
Malta 0 0 1 8
Netherlands 6 4895 14 10857
Poland 4 6490 6 3600
Portugal 10 622 25 775
Romania 1 - 6 1353
Slovenia 1 3 3 -
Spain 33 1034 97 7926
Sweden 108 4018 334 7512
United Kingdom 4 901 49 12409
Total 619 97507 1391 131459


Figure 3: Map of Marine Protected Areas designated under the Regional Sea Conventions, situation 2015. From EEA 2015[13]



In Europe the vast majority of MPAs are located in the territorial waters of the Member States. However, the European Commission demands an extension of the application of the Natura 2000 network to the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). There are already some offshore sites, most notably in Germany which committed in March 2005 to protect 38% of its marine waters as MPAs, and nominated ten Environmentally Sound Fishery Management Areas within its EEZ.[4]

Discussion

It becomes evident that a well-managed European MPA network can play a crucial role in the conservation of both marine biodiversity and ecological processes and can make a contribution to sustainable development of the coastal zone. In order to arrive at a holistic and integrative MPA management approach it is important that all relevant ecological, social and economic factors are taken into account and that stakeholders become involved in the decision-making process. As far as the implementation record of MPAs is concerned in Europe progress has been made and the number of designated Natura 2000 marine sites has increased steadily.

See Also

Internal Links

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
Biodiversity in the European Seas
Effects of fisheries on marine biodiversity

External Links

Natura 2000 in the Marine Environment
German marine protected areas
OSPAR Marine protected areas
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds

References

  1. ↑ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Chapter 18: Marine Fisheries Systems. Retrieved February, 2010 from: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.287.aspx.pdf
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 IUCN (2017). Marine protected areas and climate change. https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/marine-protected-areas-and-climate-change
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 CBD Aichi Targets https://www.cbd.int/aichi-targets/target/11
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 UNEP – WCMC (2008). National and Regional Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Review of Progress. Cambridge: UNEP – WCMC. https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/national-and-regional-networks-of-marine-protected-areas-a-review-of-progress
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 IUCN (1994). Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland
  6. ↑ Angula-Valdés, J., Hatcher, B. (2010). A new typology of benefits derived from marine protected areas. Marine Policy 34: 635-644
  7. ↑ IEEP (2008). Marine Protected Areas in Europe and the United States. A report from the transatlantic platform for action on the global environment. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy.
  8. ↑ Ramsar Convention (1987). Convention on Wetlands of International Importance. https://www.ramsar.org/about-the-convention-on-wetlands-0
  9. ↑ Council of Europe (n.d.). Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. https://rm.coe.int/1680078aff
  10. ↑ CFP Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32013R1380
  11. ↑ European Commission (2007). Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/marine/docs/marine_guidelines.pdf
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 European Commission (2009). Natura 2000 Barometer. European Commission Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter. Number 27 December 2009. Retrieved February 2nd, 2010, from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/nat27_en.pdf
  13. ↑ Marine protected areas in Europe's seas. An overview and perspectives for the future. EEA report 3/2015
The main author of this article is Huth, Anne-Christine
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
Citation: Huth, Anne-Christine (2021): Marine Protected Areas in Europe. Available from http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Marine_Protected_Areas_in_Europe [accessed on 21-11-2024]



‏‎

Retrieved from "https://www.coastalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Marine_Protected_Areas_in_Europe&oldid=79263"